| [2020] FWC 6425 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.240 - Application to deal with a bargaining dispute
Toll Transport Pty Limited T/A Toll Shipping
v
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(B2020/98)
COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE | SYDNEY, 30 NOVEMBER 2020 |
Application to deal with a bargaining dispute.
[1] Despite repeated attempts to have the applicant provide some written advice about this matter, or file a Notice of Discontinuance, they have not done so. Therefore, pursuant to s.587 of the Fair Work Act 2009, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
[2] An Order [PR724992] dismissing the matter will be issued concurrently with this Decision.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR724991>
- AGLC
- Toll Transport Pty Limited T/A Toll Shipping v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2020] FWC 6425
- Case
- [2020] FWC 6425
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether the industrial action taken by the union constituted protected action under the Act and if the Commission had the authority to make orders to restrain the industrial action. The court needed to balance the union's right to engage in protected industrial action with the potential harm to the employer and the public caused by the action. The Commission considered whether the industrial action was genuinely undertaken for the purpose of a protected industrial dispute and whether it was reasonable in the circumstances.
The Commission found that the union's industrial action was protected and that the application to restrain it was not justified. The union's action was genuinely undertaken in relation to a protected industrial dispute and was reasonable. The Commission concluded that the industrial action was proportionate to the bargaining claims and that the potential harm to Toll Shipping and the public did not outweigh the union's right to engage in the action. Therefore, the application was dismissed.
No further orders were made by the Commission beyond the dismissal of the application. The union's right to engage in protected industrial action remained intact, and the bargaining process continued without further interference from the Commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.