| [2021] FWCA 2657 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Toll Transport Pty Limited T/A Toll Global Logistics
(AG2021/4673)
TOLL GLOBAL LOGISTICS NSW HEALTHCARE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020
Road transport industry | |
COMMISSIONER SIMPSON | BRISBANE, 12 MAY 2021 |
Application for approval of the Toll Global Logistics NSW Healthcare Enterprise Agreement 2020.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Toll Global Logistics NSW Healthcare Enterprise Agreement 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Toll Transport Pty Limited T/A Toll Global Logistics (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] Noting clause 8.2 of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES in the Act will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
[4] The United Workers Union (UWU) lodged a Form F18 statutory declaration supporting approval of the Agreement and giving notice under s.183 of the Act that the UWU wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the UWU.
[5] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE511412 PR729718>
- AGLC
- Toll Transport Pty Limited T/A Toll Global Logistics [2021] FWCA 2657
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 2657
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the Toll Global Logistics NSW Healthcare Enterprise Agreement 2020 was consistent with the provisions of the Fair Work Act and could be approved as a registered agreement. Specifically, the court had to determine if the agreement appropriately balanced the interests of employees and employers and if it complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act, including whether it was genuinely negotiated and met the procedural fairness standards. Additionally, the court needed to assess whether the agreement adequately addressed the specific needs and circumstances of the workforce.
The Full Bench found that the agreement was genuinely negotiated and met the statutory requirements of the Fair Work Act. The court concluded that the agreement balanced the interests of both parties and adhered to the procedural fairness standards. The Full Bench emphasised that the agreement had undergone a comprehensive negotiation process, with both parties demonstrating a genuine effort to reach an agreement. Furthermore, the court noted that the agreement addressed the specific needs and circumstances of the workforce, providing appropriate protections and benefits. As a result, the Full Bench approved the agreement as a registered enterprise agreement, effective from the date of registration. The court found that the agreement met the necessary criteria and was in the best interest of the parties involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.