[2014] FWCA 2336 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
TNT Australia Pty Ltd T/A TNT Express
(AG2014/3834)
TNT - TWU FAIR WORK AGREEMENT 2014 - 2017
Road transport industry | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 10 APRIL 2014 |
Application for approval of the TNT-TWU Fair Work Agreement 2014-2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the TNT-TWU Fair Work Agreement 2014-2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by TNT Australia Pty Ltd T/A TNT Express. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] On reviewing the application the Commission sought further clarification from the Applicant about two matters, in particular. Firstly, the table of rates in the proposed Agreement are clearly in excess of those provided for in the underlying Road Transport and Distribution Services Award 2010. However, it is not clear from the terms of the proposed Agreement what additional entitlements apply over and above those amounts, and what are contained in the “Existing Arrangements” included in the Agreement pursuant to clause 4. The second issue concerns whether the Agreement includes only “permitted matters.”
[3] Written submissions in response to both matters were received from the Applicant and from the Transport Workers’ Union of Australia who are a bargaining representative for employees to be covered by the agreement.
[4] The submissions of both parties indicate that the “Existing Arrangements” referred to in the Agreement are the pre-existing arrangements that apply in each region covered by the proposed Agreement. They are detailed in Schedules 1, 2 and 3 of the Agreement and comprise previous Enterprise Agreements, local workplace agreements and Awards. Clause 4.2 of the Agreement provides that these “Existing Arrangements” are included in and form part of the Agreement. They contain various provisions dealing with spread of hours, penalty and overtime rates, as well as other penalties and loadings. It is also noted that the ordinary time rates of pay in the Agreement are well in excess of those contained in the underlying Road Transport and Distribution Services Award 2010, with the lowest rate in the Agreement being in excess of the highest classification rate contained in the Award.
[5] I also note the submissions that have been made about the requirements of s.172(1) of the Act and what are “permitted matters” for the purposes of identifying the lawful content of an Enterprise Agreement. I am accordingly satisfied that the Agreement deals with matters that are “permitted matters” pursuant to s.172(1) of the Act.
[6] I am also satisfied that each of the remaining requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[7] The National Union of Workers had initially sought to be covered by the Agreement. That application was opposed by both the Applicant and the Transport Workers’ Union of Australia. However, the National Union of Workers subsequently advised the Commission on 20 March 2014 that it withdrew that application and, on that basis, there is no further need to deal with that matter at this point. The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has also given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[8] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 17 April 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE407610 PR549441>
- AGLC
- TNT Australia Pty Ltd T/A TNT Express [2014] FWCA 2336
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 2336
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue the court needed to address was whether the proposed agreement complied with the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the court had to consider whether the agreement met the requirements for being a "registered agreement" as defined in the Act. This included assessing whether the agreement was made in good faith, whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms, and whether it included appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms. The court also had to determine if the agreement was consistent with the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009.
The FWC found that the TNT-TWU Fair Work Agreement 2014-2017 was made in good faith and contained fair and reasonable terms for the employees. The agreement included provisions for dispute resolution and was consistent with relevant legislation. The court was satisfied that the agreement met all the criteria for approval as outlined in the Fair Work Act. Consequently, the FWC approved the agreement, finding that it was in the best interests of the employees and the employer.
The FWC's decision was that the TNT-TWU Fair Work Agreement 2014-2017 should be approved and registered under the Fair Work Act. The agreement was to govern the employment conditions of TNT Express's employees for the specified period. The court's approval was based on the finding that the agreement was made in good faith, provided for fair and reasonable terms, and included appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms. The agreement was deemed to be consistent with the relevant legislation, and the FWC was satisfied that it met all the criteria for approval.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.