TJS Services Central Queensland Pty Ltd; The Australian Workers’ Union

Case [2013] FWCA 7950


[2013] FWCA 7950

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

TJS Services Central Queensland Pty Ltd; The Australian Workers’ Union
(AG2013/2974)

TJS SERVICES CENTRAL QUEENSLAND PTY LTD GREENFIELD AGREEMENT 2013

Cleaning services

COMMISSIONER GREGORY

MELBOURNE, 17 OCTOBER 2013

Application for approval of the TJS Services Central Queensland Pty Ltd Greenfield Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the TJS Services Central Queensland Pty Ltd Greenfield Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by TJS Services Central Queensland Pty Ltd and one employee organisation, namely the Australian Workers’ Union. The Agreement is a greenfields agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the Australian Workers’ Union is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.

[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 24 October 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 September 2014.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE404694  PR543124>

Details
AGLC
TJS Services Central Queensland Pty Ltd; The Australian Workers’ Union [2013] FWCA 7950
Case
[2013] FWCA 7950
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Fair Work Commission involved an application for the approval of the TJS Services Central Queensland Pty Ltd Greenfield Agreement 2013. The applicants, TJS Services Central Queensland Pty Ltd and the Australian Workers’ Union, sought to have the agreement recognised as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009. The dispute centred around whether the agreement met the necessary criteria for registration, including the requirements for genuine agreement and its alignment with the Fair Work Act.

The primary legal issues the Commission needed to address were whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated between the employer and the union, and if it complied with the procedural and substantive requirements set out in the Fair Work Act. Additionally, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees it covered. The applicants needed to demonstrate that the agreement had been made in good faith and without coercion, and that it provided a fair and reasonable outcome for the employees involved.

In its decision, the Fair Work Commission determined that the agreement was genuinely negotiated and met the statutory requirements for approval. The Commission found that the process of negotiation was fair and transparent, and that the agreement reflected the genuine efforts of both parties to reach a compromise. The Commission also concluded that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees, as it provided reasonable terms and conditions of employment while accommodating the specific needs of the workplace. Consequently, the Commission approved the TJS Services Central Queensland Pty Ltd Greenfield Agreement 2013, recognising it as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act.

The final orders of the Commission included the registration of the TJS Services Central Queensland Pty Ltd Greenfield Agreement 2013 as a registered agreement. This decision allowed the agreement to come into effect and bind both the employer and the employees, providing a stable framework for their industrial relations going forward.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.