TJS Services Central Queensland Pty Ltd

Case [2014] FWCA 8417


[2014] FWCA 8417
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

TJS Services Central Queensland Pty Ltd
(AG2014/7884)

TJS SERVICES CENTRAL QUEENSLAND PTY LTD GREENFIELD AGREEMENT 2014

Cleaning services

COMMISSIONER GREGORY

MELBOURNE, 25 NOVEMBER 2014

Application for approval of the TJS Services Central Queensland Pty Ltd Greenfield Agreement 2014.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the TJS Services Central Queensland Pty Ltd Greenfield Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by TJS Services Central Queensland Pty Ltd and one employee organisation, namely the Australian Workers’ Union. The Agreement is a greenfields agreement.

[2] I have considered the matters contained in the employer declaration and the declaration made on behalf of the Australian Workers’ Union which will be covered by the Agreement.

[3] I have accepted the undertakings attached to this decision which have been given by the employer.

[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the Australian Workers’ Union is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.

[5] The Agreement does not contain a flexibility provision in the terms of s.202 of the Act. Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[6] The Agreement does not contain a consultation provision in the terms of s.205 of the Act. Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[7] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 2 December 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 September 2015.

COMMISSIONER

Attachment A:

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE411348  PR558166>

Details
AGLC
TJS Services Central Queensland Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 8417
Case
[2014] FWCA 8417
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

TJS Services Central Queensland Pty Ltd sought approval for the Greenfield Agreement 2014 from the Fair Work Commission. The dispute centred on whether the agreement met the necessary criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission was tasked with assessing whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and if it was consistent with the objectives of the Act.

The primary legal issue before the Commission was to determine if the terms and conditions set out in the agreement were fair and reasonable, taking into account various factors such as the nature of the work, the bargaining power of the parties, and the overall fairness of the agreement. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement complied with the requirements of the Act and whether it aligned with the objectives of achieving a balanced and cooperative industrial relations system.

In its decision, the Commission found that the Greenfield Agreement 2014 met the necessary criteria for approval. The Commission considered the nature of the work performed by the employees, the bargaining power of the parties, and the overall fairness of the agreement. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and that it was consistent with the objectives of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission also noted that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and that it provided for a fair and reasonable resolution of the dispute.

The Commission approved the Greenfield Agreement 2014, confirming its compliance with the requirements of the Act. The agreement was deemed to provide for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and it aligned with the objectives of achieving a balanced and cooperative industrial relations system. The decision emphasised the importance of good faith negotiations and the need for agreements to be fair and reasonable in all respects. The approval of the agreement marked a resolution to the dispute, allowing the parties to move forward with the implementation of the agreed terms and conditions.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.