Timothy John Keleher v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited ("ANZ")

[2022] FWC 2488

[2022] FWC 2488

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.394 - Application for unfair dismissal remedy

Timothy John Keleher

v

Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited ("ANZ")

(U2022/8743)

cOMMISSIONER bISSETT MELBOURNE, 16 SEPTEMBER 2022

Application for relief from unfair dismissal – minimum employment period – dismissal under s.587 at the Commission’s initiative.

1. On 26 August 2022, Mr Timothy John Keleher (the Applicant) made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).

1. The Applicant advised in the Form F2 Unfair Dismissal Application (Form F2) that he commenced employment with Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited ("ANZ") on 7 February 2022 and that he was notified of his dismissal on 5 August 2022.

1. On 28 August 2022, the Commission emailed correspondence to the Applicant’s nominated email address advising the Applicant that based on the information provided in the Form F2, he had not served the minimum employment period. The correspondence directed the Applicant to file any documents and evidence to support his claim that he had served the required minimum employment period. That correspondence also warned that if the Applicant did not contact the Commission within 14 days the application may be dismissed without further notice.

1. On 5 September 2022, the Applicant replied to the Commission via email confirming that the dates entered on the application form were correct and that Minimum Employment Period was not met.

1. Later that day the Commission attempted to contact the Applicant on his nominated telephone number. Voicemail messages were left requesting the Applicant contact the Commission to confirm whether he would like to discontinue the application. The voicemail directed the Applicant to contact the Commission by 13 September 2022. The Applicant was informed that if the Commission does not receive a response by that date his application for dismissal will be allocated to a member of the Commission.

1. The Commission has received no further communication from the Applicant since the 5 September 2022.

1. Section 382 of the FW Act provides that a person is protected from unfair dismissal if they have completed a period of employment of at least the minimum employment period.

1. In the circumstances of this matter, I am satisfied that the Applicant has not completed the required minimum employment period and his application has no reasonable prospects of success.

1. Section 383 of the FW Act sets out the minimum employment period as follows:

383 Meaning of minimum employment period

The minimum employment period is:

(a)if the employer is not a small business employer—6 months ending at the earlier of the following times:

(i)        the time when the person is given notice of the dismissal;

(ii)       immediately before the dismissal; or

(b)       if the employer is a small business employer—one year ending at that time.

1. Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides that:

587 Dismissing applications

(1)Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a)       the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b)       the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c)       the application has no reasonable prospects of success.

1. Having regard to the circumstances of this matter I am satisfied that as the Applicant has not completed the required minimum employment period under the FW Act, his application has no reasonable prospect of success. As such, the application is dismissed under s.587(1)(c) of the FW Act. An Order[1] to this effect will be issued shortly.

COMMISSIONER

[1] PR745938

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR745937>