| [2022] FWCA 3882 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Timbertruss a Division of Bowen & Pomeroy Pty Ltd
(AG2022/4486)
Timbertruss a division of Bowen and Pomeroy Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement - 2022 - 2025
| Timber and paper products industry | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT COLMAN | MELBOURNE, 4 NOVEMBER 2022 |
Application for approval of the Timbertruss a division of Bowen and Pomeroy Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement - 2022 - 2025
Timbertruss a Division of Bowen & Pomeroy Pty Ltd has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Timbertruss a division of Bowen and Pomeroy Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement - 2022 - 2025 (the Agreement) pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval has been met. Pursuant to s 205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2) and based on its declaration, I note that the Agreement covers the CFMMEU.
The Agreement was approved on 4 November 2022 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 11 November 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2025.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE518067 PR747620>
- AGLC
- Timbertruss a Division of Bowen & Pomeroy Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 3882
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 3882
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act, including whether it met the requirements for "enterprise agreements" and whether it provided for the protection of employee rights and entitlements. Specifically, the Commission had to consider if the agreement provided adequate safeguards for employee conditions, including minimum wages, leave entitlements, and other protections.
In rendering its decision, the Commission closely examined the proposed agreement against statutory criteria. It found that the agreement contained comprehensive provisions that addressed all necessary elements, including minimum wages, leave entitlements, and procedural protections for employees. The Commission also noted the absence of any opposition from the union, which represented the employees, as a positive indicator of the agreement's acceptability. Based on these findings, the Commission determined that the proposed enterprise agreement was fair and appropriate, and thus approved it.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.