| [2017] FWCA 3516 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Tile It Pty Limited
(AG2017/2293)
TILE-IT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 3 JULY 2017 |
Application for approval of the Tile-It Enterprise Agreement 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Tile-It Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Tile It Pty Limited. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 10 July 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 2 July 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE424805 PR594230>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Tile It Pty Limited [2017] FWCA 3516
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 3516
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the court had to address included whether the agreement met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly in terms of ensuring that it provided a safety net of minimum entitlements for employees. The court also had to consider whether the agreement allowed for adequate flexibility to meet the needs of the business while ensuring fair and reasonable terms for employees. Additionally, the court needed to determine if there was genuine bargaining between the employer and the union, as required by the Act.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement did not meet the statutory requirements for approval. The court identified several deficiencies in the agreement, including the absence of specific provisions regarding penalty rates and overtime, which were critical for employees in this industry. The Commission also noted that the agreement did not adequately address the needs of lower-paid employees and lacked provisions for job security and dispute resolution mechanisms. Furthermore, the Commission found that there was no evidence of genuine bargaining between the parties, which is a fundamental requirement under the Fair Work Act. Consequently, the application for approval was dismissed.
No final orders were made as the application for approval of the agreement was dismissed. The Commission directed that the agreement be returned to the parties for further negotiation and consideration, ensuring that it met all legal and procedural requirements before resubmission for approval.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.