TI
v
THE QUEEN
[2016] HCASL 95
C1/2016
The application does not raise any issue of principle suitable for the grant of special leave. If special leave to appeal were granted, the appeal would have insufficient prospects of success. Special leave is refused.
Pursuant to r 41.11.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
V.M. Bell
12 May 2016S.J. Gageler
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read TI v The Queen and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2016] HCASL 95
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Court found that the application did not raise any issue of principle suitable for the grant of special leave. The Court held that the appeal would have insufficient prospects of success if special leave were granted. The Court considered that the appeal was not likely to result in a different outcome and that the applicant's chances of success were minimal.
The Court refused the application for special leave and directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. The order was to be made pursuant to rule 41.11.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth). The Court's decision was final, and the appeal was dismissed.
The Court's decision in this case highlights the importance of the criteria for granting special leave to appeal in the High Court of Australia. The Court emphasised that the application must raise an issue of principle suitable for the grant of special leave and that the appeal must have sufficient prospects of success. The decision also demonstrates the Court's cautious approach to granting special leave and the importance of the applicant demonstrating a strong likelihood of success on appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.