FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| THORPE & THORPE AND ANOR | [2012] FamCA 719 |
| FAMILY LAW - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Part heard application by a third party for summary dismissal of wife’s claim – Whether the wife’s application is doomed to fail – Whether the wife has established a claim in equity in respect of land owned by third party - wife’s application against third party dismissed |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 117 |
| APPLICANT: | Ms Thorpe |
| FIRST RESPONDENT: | Mr Thorpe |
| SECOND RESPONDENT: | Ms R Thorpe |
| FILE NUMBER: | CSC | 547 | of | 2009 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 4 July 2012 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Cairns |
| PLACE HEARD: | Cairns |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Benjamin J |
| HEARING DATE: | 4 July 2012 |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: | Ms Sinclair |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Bottoms English Lawyers |
| COUNSEL FOR THE FIRST RESPONDENT: | Mr P Tree S.C |
SOLICITOR FOR THE FIRST RESPONDENT: | Apels Solicitors |
COUNSEL FOR THE SECOND RESPONDENT: | Mr P Tree S.C |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE SECOND RESPONDENT: | Farrellys Lawyers |
Orders
The proceedings brought by the applicant wife against the second respondent are summarily dismissed.
The applicant wife shall pay the first and second respondent’s costs determined in accordance with the Rules and scales under the Family Law Act (including certification for Senior Counsel), payment of such costs to be stayed pending either determination of the property proceedings between the husband and wife or such other time as is ordered by a Court exercising jurisdiction under the Family Law Act.
The costs application of the husband as against the wife in respect of the summary dismissal application be reserved.
These proceedings be adjourned to a Registrar’s Directions hearing at 10.00 am on 27 August 2012 at Cairns in respect of the property proceedings between the husband and wife.
IT IS CERTIFIED
Pursuant to Rule 19.50 of the Family Law Rules 2004 it was reasonable to engage senior counsel to attend.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Thorpe & Thorpe and Anor has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT CAIRNS |
FILE NUMBER: CSC 547 of 2009
| Ms Thorpe |
Applicant
And
| Mr Thorpe |
First Respondent
| Ms R Thorpe |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
These are part heard proceedings for the summary dismissal of equitable proceedings either accrued to this Court or under the relatively new provisions of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (“the Family Law Act”) with regard to third parties.
The application was first heard by me in October last year and was the subject of significant debate as to the nature of the claim against the second respondent. After hearing submissions, I considered those matters and delivered reasons in relation to the application. The reason I did so is quite clear, that the claim made against the third party or the second respondent had some defects which, effectively, made the claim almost fatally flawed. It seemed to me that the claim of the wife in…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Thorpe and Thorpe and Anor and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2012] FamCA 719
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the wife's proceedings against the second respondent were so lacking in merit that they should be dismissed without a full hearing. This involved an assessment of the evidence and legal arguments presented to determine if there was a sufficient basis to proceed to trial.
Benjamin J found that the proceedings brought by the applicant wife against the second respondent lacked sufficient merit to warrant a full hearing and therefore summarily dismissed them. The court ordered that the applicant wife pay the costs of both the first and second respondents, with the payment of these costs stayed pending the determination of the property proceedings between the husband and wife. The court also reserved the husband's costs application against the wife concerning the summary dismissal application and adjourned the property proceedings to a future date. The court certified that it was reasonable to engage senior counsel in the proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The proceedings brought by the applicant wife against the second respondent are summarily dismissed.
2.
The applicant wife shall pay the first and second respondent’s costs determined in accordance with the Rules and scales under the Family Law Act (including certification for Senior Counsel), payment of such costs to be stayed pending either determination of the property proceedings between the husband and wife or such other time as is ordered by a Court exercising jurisdiction under the Family Law Act.
3.
The costs application of the husband as against the wife in respect of the summary dismissal application be reserved.
4.
These proceedings be adjourned to a Registrar’s Directions hearing at 10.00 am on 27 August 2012 at Cairns in respect of the property proceedings between the husband and wife.
IT IS CERTIFIED
5.
Pursuant to Rule 19.50 of the Family Law Rules 2004 it was reasonable to engage senior counsel to attend.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.