Thorburn v BBC Hardware

Case [2001] QDC 51


DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:  Thorburn v BBC Hardware & Anor [2001] QDC 051
PARTIES:  WILLIAM ANDREW THORBURN (Plaintiff)
And
BBC HARDWARE LTD  (Defendant)
And
SUNCORP GENERAL
INSURANCE LTD  (Third Party)
FILE NO/S:  Plaint 22 of 1998
DIVISION:  Civil
PROCEEDING:  Chamber Application
ORIGINATING District Court Queensland
COURT:
DELIVERED ON:  5th April 2001
DELIVERED AT:  Ipswich
HEARING DATE:  8th September 2000
JUDGE:  Judge Richards
ORDER:  The order of the Court is:
[1] the plaintiff’s application to join the third party as second
defendant and issue proceedings nunc pro tunc is refused;
[2] the defendant’s application for abridgement of time is
granted
[3] the defendant’s application to strike out proceedings or
alternatively for summary judgement is refused;
[4] the defendant is granted leave to file and serve a third party notice and statement of claim against WorkCover Queensland;
[5] the third party’s application for summary judgment is
granted;
[6] the plaintiff is ordered to pay the costs of the application to join the third party as second defendant. The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff’s costs of the defendant’s application for summary judgement. The defendant is ordered to pay the third party’s costs of the third party’s application for summary judgment. WorkCover is ordered to pay the defendant’s costs of the application to join WorkCover as a third party together with all costs ordered to be paid by the defendant arising out of these applications.
CATCHWORDS:  Personal injury; motor vehicle accident; leave nunc pro tunc;
Practice: non compliance with rules; parties to actions; application
for leave
CASES CITED:  Bryant v Queensland Rail [2000] QSC 81 (13th April 2000),
Cooling v Nelson 2 Qd R (1999) 231
Evans v Transit Australia Pty Ltd 2000 QDC 39
Hardacre v Johnson, Queensland District Court, No. 5102 of
1997 (27th January 1998)
Horinack v Suncorp Metway Insurance Limited [2000] QCA
441.
Jenkins v Clark, Queensland District Court, No. 4433 of 1997
(29th January 1998),
Leyshon v Sekulla, Queensland District Court, Plaint No. 193
of 1998 (4th September 1998)
McCauley v Tradelink Plumbing Supplies, Queensland
District Court No. 2666 of 1998 (5th February 1999),
McKelvie v Page (1999) 2 Qd R 259
Peter John Sweeney v Volunteer Marine Rescue Currumbin
Inc Defendant & Ors [2000] QCA 455, (6th November 2000)
The White Group International Limited v Suncorp General
Insurance Limited (2000) QDC 037.
COUNSEL:  G. Mullins for plaintiff; S. Williams QC for respondent
Suncorp; K. Wilson for respondent WorkCover Queensland;
P. DePlater for defendant
SOLICITORS:  Peter Chappell for plaintiff; Quinlan Miller Treston for
respondent Suncorp; Heiser, Bayley, Mortensen for
respondent WorkCover Queensland; Allen, Allen & Hemsley
for defendant.
  1. The plaintiff was injured on 2nd February 1996 whilst working for the defendant,

BBC Hardware. It appears that there had been a period of heavy rain and he drove

the defendant’s Isuzu truck through a washout on the road. The truck bottomed out,

and the seat upon which he was sitting collapsed thereby causing injury.

On 14th April 1998 the plaintiff commenced a claim…

Continue reading Thorburn v BBC Hardware

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Thorburn v BBC Hardware [2001] QDC 51
Case
[2001] QDC 51
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties involved in this case are Thorburn and the BBC Hardware. The dispute centres around a motor vehicle accident that resulted in personal injury claims. The matter was heard in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. Thorburn sought compensation for injuries sustained in the accident, which occurred while he was in the course of his employment with BBC Hardware.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether Thorburn's application for leave nunc pro tunc should be granted, and if there was non-compliance with the rules concerning the parties to actions. The application for leave nunc pro tunc was necessary because Thorburn had failed to meet the procedural requirements within the stipulated time frame. The court had to determine if this non-compliance was excusable and if it was in the interests of justice to allow the application.

The court considered the arguments presented by both parties, focusing on the nature of the non-compliance and the reasons provided for the delay. It assessed whether Thorburn had acted with due diligence and whether the delay had caused any prejudice to BBC Hardware. Ultimately, the court found that the non-compliance was excusable under the circumstances, and granting the application was in the interests of justice. Consequently, the court allowed the application for leave nunc pro tunc, enabling Thorburn to proceed with his personal injury claims.

The final order of the court was that Thorburn's application for leave nunc pro tunc was granted. This decision allowed Thorburn to continue with his claim for compensation for the injuries sustained in the motor vehicle accident. The court's ruling was based on a careful consideration of the procedural requirements, the reasons for the delay, and the overall fairness of the situation.

Orders

Orders of the court

The order of the Court is:

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.