FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Theodore & Theodore (No. 3) [2021] FamCA 452
File number(s): PAC 5789 of 2014 Judgment of: FOSTER J Date of judgment: 2 July 2021 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – COSTS – where application for costs made by the Independent Children’s Lawyer – where consideration of applicable principles – where proper for an order that the father pay the whole of the Independent Children’s Lawyer’s costs. Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 117, 117(2), 117(2A), 117(3), 117(4), 117(5)
Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) r 19.18(1)
Cases cited: Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (No. 2) (1995) 135 ALR 160
De Roma & De Roma [2013] FamCA 566
Gahen & Gahen (No. 2) [2013] FamCA 936
Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd [2007] NSWSC 23
Parke & the Estate of the Late A Parke (2016) FLC 93-748
Theodore & Theodore [2021] FamCA 321
Number of paragraphs: 32 Date of last submission/s: 4 June 2021 Date of hearing: 22, 23, 24 and 25 June 2020 and 27, 28 and 29 January 2021 Place: Parramatta Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Schroder Solicitor for the Applicant: Chapman & Smyth Family Law Pty Ltd Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Batey Solicitor for the Respondent: Madison Marcus Law Firm Counsel for the Independent Children's Lawyer: Mr Braine Solicitor for the Independent Children's Lawyer: Ms Rutkowska of Ark Law Lawyers ORDERS
PAC 5789 of 2014 BETWEEN: MS THEODORE
ApplicantAND: MR THEODORE
RespondentMS RUTKOWSKA
Independent Children’s Lawyer
ORDER MADE BY:
FOSTER J
DATE OF ORDER:
2 JULY 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.That the father Mr Theodore pay the costs of the Independent Children’s Lawyer in the sum of $21,087 within three months.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Theodore & Theodore has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
FOSTER J:
On 21 May 2021 reasons for judgment were delivered and final orders made in final parenting proceedings. The final trial was conducted on 22, 23, 24 and 25 June 2020 and 27, 28 and 29 January 2021.
Ultimately, a final order was relevantly made that provided for the father to have time with the subject children, until each of them reach the age of 14 years, on the first Saturday of each calendar month, supervised by a commercial supervisor.
These reasons for judgment in relation to an application for costs by the Independent Children’s Lawyer in the sum of $21,087 assumes familiarity with that final judgment: Theodore & Theodore [2021] FamCA 321.
Directions were made for each…
Continue reading Theodore & Theodore (No. 3)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Theodore & Theodore (No. 3) [2021] FamCA 452
- Case
- [2021] FamCA 452
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was the application of the principles governing costs orders in family law proceedings, specifically in relation to the costs incurred by an Independent Children’s Lawyer. The court was required to determine whether it was appropriate to order the father to bear the entirety of the ICL's costs.
Foster J reasoned that it was proper for the father to be ordered to pay the whole of the Independent Children’s Lawyer’s costs. The court ordered that the father, Mr Theodore, pay the costs of the Independent Children’s Lawyer in the sum of $21,087 within three months.
Orders
Orders of the court
PAC 5789 of 2014
BETWEEN:
MS THEODORE
Applicant
AND:
MR THEODORE
Respondent
MS RUTKOWSKA
Independent Children’s Lawyer
ORDER MADE BY:
FOSTER J
DATE OF ORDER:
2 JULY 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. That the father Mr Theodore pay the costs of the Independent Children’s Lawyer in the sum of $21,087 within three months.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.