FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
(DIVISION 2)
Theodore & Ambrose [2022] FedCFamC2F 1619
File number(s): DUC 105 of 2022 Judgment of: JUDGE OBRADOVIC Date of judgment: 24 November 2022 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – Interim Parenting – short form reasons – where final consent orders made in 2019 – father engaged in criminal activity – assessment of risk – best interest of child – parental responsibility – child to spend gradually increasing time with father – orders for drug testing. Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss.60CC, 69ZL Cases cited: 1 Beaton & Beaton [2020] FamCAFC 297
Goode v Goode [2006] FamCA 1346
Isles v Nelissen [2022] FedCFamC1A 97
2 Keats & Keats [2016] FamCAFC 156
Division: Division 2 Family Law Number of paragraphs: 47 Date of hearing: 22 November 2022 Place: Parramatta Counsel for the Applicant: Ms Otrebski Solicitors for the Applicant: Richard Wise Solicitor Appearing for the Respondent: Mr Virgona Solicitors for the Respondent: Mastronardi Legal Appearing for the Independent Children’s Lawyer: Ms Hughes Solicitors for the Independent Children’s Lawyer: Hughes And Co Lawyers And Conveyancing ORDERS
DUC 105 of 2022 FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 2)
BETWEEN: MS THEODORE
Applicant
AND: MR AMBROSE
Respondent
order made by:
JUDGE OBRADOVIC
DATE OF ORDER:
24 November 2022
PENDING FURTHER ORDER, THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Order 1.2 made on 18 July 2022 is discharged.
2.The child X born in 2013 (“the child”) shall spend time with the father, Mr Ambrose, as follows:
(a)Commencing on Saturday 3 December 2022 and each alternate Saturday thereafter from 9am to 4pm;
(b)Commencing on Saturday 11 February 2023 and each alternate weekend thereafter from 9am Saturday to 4pm Saturday and from 9am Sunday to 4pm Sunday; and
(c)Commencing on Saturday 1 June 2023 and each alternate weekend thereafter from 9am Saturday to 4pm Sunday.
3.The time in Order 2 is conditional upon the following:
(a)Forthwith, the father do all things and acts and sign all documents necessary to enrol in drug and alcohol counselling and provide confirmation of his enrolment to the mother’s legal representatives and the Independent Children’s Lawyer as soon as reasonably practicable;
(b)The father attend appointments with the drug and alcohol counsellor at a frequency recommended by the said counsellor and for the duration of the treatment recommended by the counsellor;
(c)The father is to provide evidence of his participation in drug and alcohol counselling to the mother’s legal representatives and the Independent Children’s Lawyer within twenty-one (21) days of these Orders.
(d)The father shall obtain a report from his drug and alcohol counsellor upon the Independent Children’s Lawyer’s request addressing the following:
(i)Dates of attendances;
(ii)Education and Therapy undertaken;
(iii)Any programs completed;
(iv)Any courses completed;
(v)Any further programs or courses recommended for the Father to complete; and
(vi)General comments.
(e)The father shall each 3 months contact and make an appointment in Town J with the Drug Detection Agency for the purpose of undertaking a chain of custody 5-panel hair follicle drug test and for the purpose of…
Continue reading Theodore & Ambrose
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Theodore & Ambrose [2022] FedCFamC2F 1619
- Case
- [2022] FedCFamC2F 1619
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the evidence, including the father's criminal history, his admission to drug use, and his recent efforts to change his lifestyle. The court acknowledged the strong relationship between the child and the father but emphasised the importance of safety. It decided that while the child was not currently at an unacceptable risk of harm, certain conditions needed to be imposed to ensure her safety. These conditions included the father's enrolment and participation in drug and alcohol counselling, regular drug testing, and immediate suspension of unsupervised visits if the father faced new criminal charges. The court also ordered a gradual increase in the child's unsupervised time with the father over a six-month period, allowing the father to demonstrate sustained change in his behaviour.
The court's decision balanced the child's need for a relationship with both parents against the need to protect her from potential harm. It recognised the father's efforts to change but stressed the importance of continued supervision and accountability. The final orders reflect these considerations, aiming to provide a safe environment for the child while gradually increasing her time with the father.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.