| [2019] FWCA 6670 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
The University of Wollongong T/A University of Wollongong
(AG2019/2149)
UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG (PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEES) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019
Educational services | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BULL | SYDNEY, 26 SEPTEMBER 2019 |
Application for approval of the University of Wollongong (Professional Services Employees) Enterprise Agreement, 2019.
[1] An application (Form F16) has been filed by The University of Wollongong T/A University of Wollongong (the applicant) for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the University of Wollongong (Professional Services Employees) Enterprise Agreement, 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement as per s.172(2) of the Act.
[2] Following issues being raised with the applicant by the Commission, the applicant provided a number of undertakings regarding the following:
• Definition of representatives;
• Minimum engagement of casual employees;
• Dispute resolution procedures;
• Span of ordinary hours;
• Weekend penalties;
• Flexible working hours;
• Notice of termination; and
• Leave entitlements and the application of the National Employment Standars (NES).
[3] The undertakings are attached at the end of the Agreement. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial change to the Agreement. Pursuant to s.201(3) of the Act, I note that the undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement.
[4] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the model consultation term is attached at the end of the Agreement. As per the decision in Auld and ors v Teekay Shipping (Australia) Pty Ltd [2019] FWCFB 6047, the model consultation term operates in conjunction with the existing consultation term of the Agreement.
[6] The Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU) and the National Tertiary Education Industry Union (NTEU) being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want to the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.
[7] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days from the date of approval. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2022.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE505459 PR712775>
- AGLC
- The University of Wollongong T/A University of Wollongong [2019] FWCA 6670
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 6670
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues that the Commission had to address included whether the agreement provided for the terms and conditions of employment of the professional services employees, whether it was free of prohibited content, and if it adhered to the Fair Work Act's requirements. Additionally, the Commission examined whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated and if the parties had complied with the procedural requirements for the application.
The Commission found that the agreement met the legal requirements for approval. It concluded that the agreement was free from prohibited content, provided for the terms and conditions of employment, and was genuinely negotiated. Furthermore, the Commission determined that the applicants had complied with the procedural requirements for the application. The Commission approved the University of Wollongong (Professional Services Employees) Enterprise Agreement, 2019, with minor modifications to ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act. The modifications included the removal of certain provisions that were found to be inconsistent with the Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.