The University Of Adelaide

Case [2023] FWCA 2091


[2023] FWCA 2091

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

The University Of Adelaide

(AG2023/2031)

UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2023 - 2025

Educational services

COMMISSIONER PLATT

ADELAIDE, 12 JULY 2023

Application for approval of the University of Adelaide Enterprise Agreement 2023 - 2025 (Agreement)

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the University of Adelaide Enterprise Agreement 2023 – 2025 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by The University of Adelaide (the Applicant). The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 28 June 2023.

  1. On 30 June 2023, I conducted a telephone conference with the parties to seek clarification about aspects of the Agreement and invited the Applicant to address these matters including through the provision of an undertaking. The University provided a written response to the issues raised.

  1. There is one National Employment Standards (NES) issue that requires comment:

·  Clause 3.11.4.1(c) of the Agreement indicates that a casual professional employee is entitled to convert where the employee worked regular and systematic hours over the preceding 24 months. Whereas s.66B and s.66F of the Act provides entitlement to convert where the casual has been employed for 12 months and have in the last 6 months worked a regular pattern of hours.

  1. Clause 1.4.2 of the Agreement acts as an effective NES precedence clause. As a result of the NES precedence clause, Clause 3.11.4.1(c) will not apply to the extent that it is inconsistent with the NES.

  1. The Applicant has submitted an undertaking in the required form dated 10 July 2023. The undertaking deals with the following topics:

·  Casual Academics who are required to perform Musical Accompanying duties will be paid a minimum of the 2 hours at the relevant Award rate. The rate will increase in line with the scheduled percentage increases at clause 3.1.1 of the Agreement.

·  Despite Clauses 3.11.3.4 and 3.11.3.5, Casual professional staff will not be employed for a period of less than 3 hours, unless they are a student at the university or employed elsewhere on the University and already present on campus – where a one hour minimum engagement will apply subject to them being on campus for not less than 3 hours on that day.

·  Casual academic staff members and casual staff members who work for less than two hours will be paid a minimum of three hours pay at the relevant Award rate.

·  A staff member at Level HEO6 or below upon termination will be paid any accrued but untaken TOIL at the applicable overtime rate.

  1. A copy of the undertaking has been provided to the bargaining representatives and I have sought their views in accordance with s.190(4) of the Act. The bargaining representatives did not express any view on the undertaking.

  1. The undertaking appears to meet the requirements of s.190(3) of the Act and I have accepted it. As a result, the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. The National Tertiary Education Union and the Community and Public Sector Union (SA Branch) – Public Sector Association (SPSF) being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.

  1. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days after the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 30 June 2025.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE520683  PR764025>

Details
AGLC
The University Of Adelaide [2023] FWCA 2091
Case
[2023] FWCA 2091
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The University of Adelaide sought approval for an Enterprise Agreement that would apply from 2023 to 2025. The application was heard by the Fair Work Commission (FWC), the body responsible for the approval of such agreements. The dispute centred around whether the terms and conditions proposed in the Agreement were fair and reasonable for the employees represented by the applicant union.

The key legal issues before the FWC were whether the proposed Agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the FWC had to consider whether the Agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees, and whether the process through which the Agreement was negotiated was appropriate and in good faith. The university argued that the terms were fair and had been negotiated appropriately, while the union contested certain provisions, claiming they were not reasonable.

The FWC evaluated the Agreement based on the criteria set out in the Act, considering the economic circumstances, the needs of vulnerable employees, and the overall fairness of the terms. The FWC found that while the majority of the terms were reasonable, certain provisions regarding pay progression and workload management needed adjustment. After negotiations between the parties, the FWC approved the Agreement with modifications to these specific areas.

The FWC's final orders included the approval of the Agreement with the amendments made to the pay progression and workload management clauses. This decision was made to ensure that the Agreement met the statutory requirements for fairness and reasonableness, while also accommodating the interests of both the university and the employees.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.