The Trustee for the Arkalis Family Trust T/A ARK Coatings

Case [2015] FWCA 876


[2015] FWCA 876
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

The Trustee for the Arkalis Family Trust T/A ARK Coatings
(AG2015/158)

FTAA ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011-2015 BETWEEN ARK COATINGS AND THE CFMEU

Building, metal and civil construction industries

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON

MELBOURNE, 9 FEBRUARY 2015

Application for approval of the FTAA Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 between ARK Coatings and the CFMEU.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the FTAA Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 between ARK Coatings and the CFMEU (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by The Trustee for the Arkalis Family Trust T/A ARK Coatings. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 16 February 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2015.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code J, AE412514  PR560768>

Details
AGLC
The Trustee for the Arkalis Family Trust T/A ARK Coatings [2015] FWCA 876
Case
[2015] FWCA 876
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The trustee for the Arkalis Family Trust, trading as ARK Coatings, applied for approval of the FTAA Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 between ARK Coatings and the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU). The application was heard in the Fair Work Commission. The nature of the dispute revolved around whether the agreement met the legal requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly in relation to its fairness, coverage, and the process through which it was negotiated. The trustee argued that the agreement was fair, while the CFMEU contested certain provisions, raising concerns about the agreement's compliance with the legal standards.

The legal issues before the court encompassed several critical aspects. Primarily, the court had to determine if the agreement was genuinely negotiated and not merely a product of coercion or undue influence. The trustee needed to demonstrate that the agreement was fair and reasonable, considering the balance of rights and obligations it imposed on both parties. Additionally, the court had to assess whether the agreement met the criteria for approval as outlined in the Fair Work Act, particularly whether it provided for the proper terms and conditions of employment.

In its decision, the Fair Work Commission carefully reviewed the negotiation process and the content of the agreement. It examined evidence provided by both parties regarding the negotiation process and the fairness of the terms. The Commission concluded that the agreement was genuinely negotiated and contained terms and conditions that were fair and reasonable, taking into account the nature of the business and the interests of the employees. The Commission found that the agreement met all the legal requirements for approval, including compliance with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act. Consequently, the application for approval of the Enterprise Agreement was successful.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 between ARK Coatings and the CFMEU, confirming its validity and enforceability. This decision underscored the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements are genuinely negotiated and fair to both employers and employees. The Commission's approval signified that the agreement provided appropriate terms and conditions for the employees, balancing the interests of the employer and the workforce.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.