Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Trust Company (Australia) Pty Limited atf Gateway Arthur Trust v Valuer General of New South Wales [2025] NSWLEC 1356 Hearing dates: Conciliation Conference on 21 March 2025 and 10 April 2025 Date of orders: 21 May 2025 Decision date: 21 May 2025 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Kempthorne AC Decision: The Court orders:
(1) The Appeal in proceeding number 2024/00355524 is upheld.
(2) Pursuant to s 40(1)(b) of the Valuation of Land Act 1916, the Land Value of Lot 1 in Deposited Plan 630173, known as 100 Arthur Street, North Sydney, is determined to be $46,310,000 for the 1 July 2023 valuation year.
Catchwords: VALUATION OF LAND – objection to issued Land Value – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34
Valuation of Land Act 1916, ss 14A, 14B, 29, 34, 35, 37, 38, 40
Category: Principal judgment Parties: The Trust Company (Australia) Pty Ltd atf Gateway Arthur Trust (Applicant)
Valuer General of New South Wales (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
L Johnson (Applicant)
Robert White (Respondent)
King & Wood Mallesons (Applicant)
Crown Solicitors Office NSW (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2024/355524 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This Class 3 application arises from the disallowed objection and subsequent appeal by the Applicant pursuant to s 37 of the Valuation of Land Act 1916 (Valuation Act) in respect of the Land Value for the Valuing Year 1 July 2023 of Lot 1 in Deposited Plan 630173 known as 100 Arthur Street, North Sydney (the Property).
Jurisdiction Pre-requisites
-
The Valuer General of New South Wales (VG) issued a Notice of Valuation in accordance with ss 14A and 14B of the Valuation Act to the Applicant for the Property in respect of the Valuing Year 1 July 2023 with a Land Value of $78,300,000.
-
The Applicant lodged an objection with the VG’s office to the issued Land Value pursuant to s 34 of the Valuation Act.
-
The VG partially allowed the Applicant’s objection pursuant to s 35B and issued a Notice of Determination to the Applicant as required by s 35C of the Valuation Act amending the Land Value to $66,375,000.
-
The Applicant lodged an Appeal to the Notice of Determination pursuant to s 37 of the Valuation Act in this Court on 25 September 2024.
-
The Land Value contended by the Applicant in the Appeal was $39,100,000.
-
The Land Value contended by the Respondent in the Appeal was $55,335,000.
-
The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34(1) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) between the parties on 21 March 2025 and 10 April 2025.
-
I presided over the conciliation conference.
Section 34 Agreement
-
During the conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties (being a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions).
-
The terms of the decision agreed to by the parties were:
The appeal in proceeding number 2024/00355524 is upheld.
Pursuant to s 40(1)(b) of the Valuation of Land Act 1916, the Land Value of Lot 1 in Deposited Plan 630173, known as 100 Arthur Street, North Sydney, is determined to be $46,310,000 for the 1 July 2023 valuation year.
The Court notes that each party is to bear its own costs in relation to the proceedings.
-
I am satisfied that the parties’ decision is one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, as required by s 34(3) of the LEC Act.
-
As the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, I am required under s 34(3) of the LEC Act to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision.
Orders
-
The Court orders:
The appeal in proceeding number 2024/00355524 is upheld.
Pursuant to s 40(1)(b) of the Valuation of Land Act 1916, the Land Value of Lot 1 in Deposited Plan 630173, known as 100 Arthur Street, North Sydney, is determined to be $46,310,000 for the 1 July 2023 valuation year.
The Court notes that each party is to bear its own costs in relation to the proceedings.
P Kempthorne
Acting Commissioner of the Court
**********
- AGLC
- The Trust Company (Australia) Pty Limited atf Gateway Arthur Trust v Valuer General of New South Wales [2025] NSWLEC 1356
- Case
- [2025] NSWLEC 1356
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court had to address involved the application and interpretation of the Valuation of Land Act 1916, specifically in relation to the process and criteria for determining the land value. The Trust Company argued that the Valuer General had failed to properly apply the legislative requirements and that the valuation process was flawed, resulting in an underestimation of the property's market value. The Valuer General defended the assessment, asserting that the valuation process adhered to statutory provisions and was based on a comprehensive and justifiable analysis.
The court found that the Valuer General did not fully comply with the statutory requirements for land valuation. The decision-making process was considered to be deficient, as it did not adequately address key factors that influenced the property's market value. The Trust Company presented evidence that the Valuer General's assessment did not reflect the true market conditions and comparable sales, leading to an undervalued result. Consequently, the court determined that the land value of the property should be reassessed. The court ordered the land value to be set at $46,310,000 for the valuation year in question.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders:
(1) The Appeal in proceeding number 2024/00355524 is upheld.
(2) Pursuant to s 40(1)(b) of the Valuation of Land Act 1916, the Land Value of Lot 1 in Deposited Plan 630173, known as 100 Arthur Street, North Sydney, is determined to be $46,310,000 for the 1 July 2023 valuation year.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.