The Royal Automobile Club of Tasmania Ltd

Case

[2020] FWCA 3277

22 JUNE 2020

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2020] FWCA 3277
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.210—Enterprise agreement

The Royal Automobile Club of Tasmania Ltd
(AG2020/1549)

ROYAL AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF TASMANIA LIMITED SALES AND ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019

Clerical industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON

MELBOURNE, 22 JUNE 2020

Application for variation of the Royal Automobile Club of Tasmania Limited Sales and Administrative Staff Enterprise Agreement 2019.

[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to the Royal Automobile Club of Tasmania Limited Sales and Administrative Staff Enterprise Agreement 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made by The Royal Automobile Club of Tasmania Ltd pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

[2] The application seeks to vary various clauses of the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.

[3] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure B. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[4] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.211 and 212 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[5] The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.

[6] In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 22 June 2020.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE506405  PR720413>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0