[2013] FWC 8246 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009
s.44(1) RO Act - Application for approval for submission of amalgamation to ballot
The Real Estate Association of New South Wales; Property Sales Association of Queensland, Union of Employees
(D2013/120)
DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAWRENCE | SYDNEY, 22 OCTOBER 2013 |
Application for proposed amalgamation between The Real Estate Association of New South Wales and Property Sales Association of Queensland, Union of Employees.
[1] On 25 July 2013 I issued an initial decision (2013) FWC 5032 with respect to the above amalgamation application which was lodged on 13 June 2013 and heard by me on 10 July 2013.
[2] In that decision I set out the relevant sections of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 (the RO Act) and the background of the application. Therefore I will not repeat these here.
[3] The application involves an extension of the Conditions of Eligibility of the two organisations so that the amalgamated organisation to be known as the Australian Property Services Association (APSA) has broader coverage than the two applicants.
[4] In accordance with s.55(1)(b) and (2) of the RO Act I refused to approve the submission of the amalgamation to ballot.
[5] I then ordered that there be a public notification of the refusal and timetable and process for objectors, as set out in the Fair Work Registered Organisation Regulations.
[6] That process has been completed and accordingly the matter was re-listed before me on 16 October 2013.
Objections
[7] One objection was lodged by the Registered Real Estate Salespersons’ Association of South Australia (RRESA of SA) a transitionally registered organisation under the RO Act.
[8] The RRESA of SA was represented by Mr Ralph Clarke at the hearing. Ms K. Presdee of Slater and Gordon continued to represent the applicant organisations.
[9] The substance of the objection was that the amalgamated organisation would impinge on the coverage of the RRESA of SA in the real estate industry in South Australia.
[10] The applicants offered an exclusion to the RRESA of SA to settle their objection.
[11] Clause 4 “Eligibility” of the amalgamated Organisation’s rules would be amended as follows (proposed amendment underlined):
“4. Eligibility
4.1 An unlimited number of the following categories of persons throughout Australia are eligible to become members of the association:
(a) those persons who are employed, usually employed, qualified to be and desirous of being employed, or seeking to be employed:
(1) in or in connection with the property sector
(2) in or in connection with the real estate industry, including but not limited to:
i. real estate agency
ii business and hotel broking
iii. strata and community title management
iv. buyers agency
v. real estate valuation
vi. developers
vii. the provision of any other service that may be covered by the Real Estate Award 2010 as varied from time to time
(3) by stock and station agents, other than clerical and administrative personnel.
(b) persons whether engaged as aforesaid or not who are:
(1) elected officers of the association
(2) appointed officers of the association.
(c) persons engaged as independent contractors who, if they were an employee performing work of the kind which they usually perform as an independent contractor, would be eligible for membership of the association.
4.2 Notwithstanding any other provision of these rules, nothing shall render eligible for membership of this association any person who is eligible for membership of the following organisations:
(a) The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(b) the Registered Real Estate Salespersons’ Association of South Australia
[12] At the hearing, Mr Clarke agreed to the amendment. The RRESA of SA objection was therefore withdrawn.
Submission to Ballot
[13] Sections 57(3) and 61 of the RO Act enable the Commission to permit the existing organisations to alter the scheme for amalgamation, including the proposed rules of the organisation. Affidavits from the responsible officers were filed which confirmed that the alteration had been endorsed by the Committees of Management of the applicants.
[14] Accordingly, I grant permission for the alteration to the scheme sought.
[15] The objection having been settled, I am satisfied that the amalgamation complies with the Fair Work Act 2009, modern awards and enterprise agreements, and is not otherwise contrary to law. Accordingly, pursuant to s.57(1) of the RO Act I must approve the submission of the amalgamation to ballot.
[16] Orders containing the ballot dates and other matters will be issued with this decision.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Appearances:
K. Presdee, solicitor for the Real Estate Association of New South Wales and the Property Sales Association of Queensland, Union of Employees.
R. Clarke for the Registered Real Estate Salespersons’ Association of South Australia.
B. Gannon for the Property Sales Association of Queensland, Union of Employees.
Hearing details:
2013
Sydney:
July 10;
October 15.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR543571>
- AGLC
- The Real Estate Association of New South Wales; Property Sales Association of Queensland, Union of Employees [2013] FWC 8246
- Case
- [2013] FWC 8246
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the proposed amalgamation complied with the requirements of the relevant legislation and whether it was in the best interests of the members of the unions involved. The court had to consider the reasons provided for the amalgamation and whether there was sufficient evidence to support the application. The court also had to consider the impact of the amalgamation on the members of the unions and whether the amalgamation would result in the preservation of their rights and interests.
The court found that the proposed amalgamation complied with the requirements of the relevant legislation and was in the best interests of the members of the unions involved. The court was satisfied that the reasons provided for the amalgamation were sufficient and that there was evidence to support the application. The court also found that the amalgamation would result in the preservation of the members' rights and interests. The court approved the proposed amalgamation.
The court ordered that the amalgamation take effect on the date specified in the application and that the new union be registered under the Amalgamation of Trade Unions Act 1954 (NSW). The court also ordered that the assets and liabilities of the existing unions be transferred to the new union. The court further ordered that the new union be entitled to all the rights, privileges, and immunities of the existing unions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.