THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE -v- HEAD & ORS [2003] WASC 91
| SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA | Citation No: | [2003] WASC 91 | |
| 26/05/2003 | |||
| Case No: | CIV:1927/2000 | 7 MAY 2003 | |
| Coram: | BARKER J | 7/05/03 | |
| 15 | Judgment Part: | 1 of 1 | |
| Result: | Informal will effective and valid Grant of letters of administration with a copy of the will annexed to the Public Trustee | ||
| B | |||
| PDF Version |
| Parties: | THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE EDITH MARJORIE HEAD PATRICIA MARY OXFORD THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE IN AND FOR THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES JOAN TASMA DUNCAN LORRAINE JOYCE POWELL ROMA JEAN PANTALL LORRI ANNE WESTERN CHERYLENE FRANCES PANTALL NORAL LEONARD PANTALL |
Catchwords: | Wills Probate Testamentary capacity Document purporting to embody testamentary intention of deceased Whether informal will has effect pursuant to s 8 of the Wills Act 1970 (WA) Whether Public Trustee entitled to order to administer the estate pursuant to s 36 of the Administration Act 1903 (WA) |
Legislation: | Administration Act 1903 (WA), s 36 Public Trustee Act 1941 (WA), s 8, s 12(1) Wills Act 1970 (WA), s 8, s 34 |
Case References: | In the Estate of Crossley; Crossley v Crossley [1989] WAR 227 In the Estate of Williams (Dec) (1984) 36 SASR 423 In the Matter of the Will of Lobato; Shields v Caratozzolo (1991) 6 WAR 1 James v Burdekin (1990) 3 WAR 298 Malatesta v Scott, unreported; SCt of WA (Murray J); Library No 940291; 15 June 1994 |
JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
- IN CIVIL
- Plaintiff
AND
EDITH MARJORIE HEAD
PATRICIA MARY OXFORD
First Defendants
THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE IN AND FOR THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Second Defendant
JOAN TASMA DUNCAN
Third Defendant
LORRAINE JOYCE POWELL
ROMA JEAN PANTALL
LORRI ANNE WESTERN
CHERYLENE FRANCES PANTALL
NORAL LEONARD PANTALL
Fourth Defendants
(Page 2)
Catchwords:
Wills - Probate - Testamentary capacity - Document purporting to embody testamentary intention of deceased - Whether informal will has effect pursuant to s 8 of the Wills Act 1970 (WA) - Whether Public Trustee entitled to order to administer the estate pursuant to s 36 of the Administration Act 1903 (WA)
Legislation:
Administration Act 1903 (WA), s 36
Public Trustee Act 1941 (WA), s 8, s 12(1)
Wills Act 1970 (WA), s 8, s 34
Result:
Informal will effective and valid
Grant of letters of administration with a copy of the will annexed to the Public Trustee
Category: B
Representation:
Counsel:
Plaintiff : Mr D L Jones
First Defendants : No appearance
Second Defendant : No appearance
Third Defendant : No appearance
Fourth Defendants : No appearance
Solicitors:
Plaintiff : Public Trustee
First Defendants : No appearance
Second Defendant : No appearance
Third Defendant : No appearance
Fourth Defendants : No appearance
(Page 3)
Case(s) referred…
Continue reading The Public Trustee v Head
Sign in free to access the full text
Details
- AGLC
- The Public Trustee v Head [2003] WASC 91
- Case
- [2003] WASC 91
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The plaintiff, the Public Trustee, filed an action seeking a determination as to the effectiveness of an informal will of Desmond Henry Pantall, deceased, dated 25 July 1992. The court was required to determine whether the informal will was valid and effective, and if so, whether the Public Trustee was entitled to a grant of letters of administration with a copy of the will annexed. The key legal issue was whether the informal will, which did not comply with the formal requirements of s 8 of the Wills Act 1970 (WA), could still be considered a valid will under s 34 of the Act. The court found that the deceased had the requisite testamentary capacity when he wrote the informal will and that he intended for it to constitute his will. The court concluded that the informal will was a valid testamentary document, and granted the Public Trustee letters of administration with a copy of the will annexed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.