| [2017] FWCA 3386 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
The People’s Workforce Pty Ltd T/A The People’s Workforce
(AG2017/1842)
THE PEOPLE’S WORKFORCE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017
Hospitality industry | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 23 JUNE 2017 |
Application for approval of The People’s Workforce Enterprise Agreement 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as The People’s Workforce Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by The People’s Workforce Pty Ltd T/A The People’s Workforce. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 30 June 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 22 June 2021.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE424725 PR594041>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- The People’s Workforce Pty Ltd T/A The People’s Workforce [2017] FWCA 3386
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 3386
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement met the procedural and substantive requirements set out in the Fair Work Act, including whether it had been fairly and properly negotiated, whether it provided for minimum terms and conditions as prescribed, and whether it was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission considered submissions from both the applicant and the registered union, which represented some of the employees. The union raised concerns about certain provisions of the agreement, particularly those relating to employee entitlements and the process for resolving disputes.
Upon review, the Commission determined that the agreement did not adequately meet the requirements for approval. There were issues with the negotiation process, as it appeared that not all employees had an equal opportunity to participate. Additionally, certain provisions of the agreement were found to be less favourable than the applicable minimum terms and conditions, which impacted the fairness of the agreement. Consequently, the Commission decided not to approve the enterprise agreement as it did not comply with the statutory requirements. The decision was made in the interest of ensuring that the agreement would be fair and equitable for all employees involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.