Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Owners – Strata Plan No 22607 v The Council of the City of Sydney [2020] NSWLEC 1324 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 7 July 2020; Documents filed 14 July 2020 Date of orders: 24 July 2020 Decision date: 24 July 2020 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Clay AC Decision: The Court orders:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) The Respondent’s Order dated 5 March 2020, issued in respect of the premises at 110-116 Sussex Street, Sydney NSW 2000 is substituted for the Order at Annexure A pursuant to s 8.18(4)(c) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
Catchwords: FIRE SAFETY ORDER – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category: Principal judgment Parties: The Owners – Strata Plan No 22607 (Applicant)
Council of the City of Sydney (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
L Nurpuri (Applicant)
A Singh (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Strata Specialist Lawyers (Applicant)
The Council of the City of Sydney (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2020/101098 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to s 8.18 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act) against a Fire Safety Order (Order) issued by the Respondent in respect of the premises at 110-116 Sussex Street, Sydney (premises).
-
The Order required the Applicant to carry out certain work to ensure and promote adequate fire safety and fire safety awareness within the premises in reliance upon Schedule 5 Part 2 EP&A Act Order 1.
-
On 7 July 2020 I presided over a conciliation conference between the parties pursuant to s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act).
-
Shortly after the conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement in principle as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties. The proposed decision was to uphold the appeal and substitute an alternative order to the one the subject of this appeal.
-
An agreement pursuant to s 34 LEC Act was filed by the parties on 14 July 2020 giving effect to the agreement in principle.
-
Pursuant to s 34(3) of the LEC Act, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ agreement if the proposed decision the subject of the agreement is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.
-
The parties’ agreement involves the Court exercising the function under s 8.18 (4) (a) of the EP&A Act to make a substitute order. The parties have stated and I agree on the basis of the material provided that the relevant jurisdictional prerequisites that are satisfied so this function can be exercised are:
provisions for fire safety or fire safety awareness are inadequate to prevent fire, suppress or prevent the spread of fire or ensure or promote the safety of persons in the event of fire;
maintenance or the use of the premises constitutes a significant fire hazard; and
the proposed substitute order is an order that the Respondent could have given.
-
As the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, I am required under s 34(3) of the LEC Act to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision.
-
The parties have not raised, and I am not aware of any jurisdictional impediment to the making of these orders. Further, I was not required to make, and have not made, any assessment of the merits of the development application against the discretionary matters that arise pursuant to an assessment under s 8.18(4) of the EP&A Act.
-
The Court orders:
The appeal is upheld.
The Respondent’s Order dated 5 March 2020, issued in respect of the premises at 110-116 Sussex Street, Sydney NSW 2000 is substituted for the Order at Annexure A pursuant to s 8.18(4)(c) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act1979.
…………………………
P Clay
Acting Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (274429, pdf)
**********
- AGLC
- The Owners - Strata Plan No 22607 v The Council of the City of Sydney [2020] NSWLEC 1324
- Case
- [2020] NSWLEC 1324
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the Council's order, dated 5 March 2020, was validly made under the statutory powers conferred by the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. Specifically, the Court had to consider whether the premises in question were indeed in a condition that posed a significant hazard to public health or safety, and if the Council's order was the appropriate response under the circumstances. Additionally, the Court examined the procedural fairness in the issuance of the order.
The Court found that the Council's order was not validly made as it did not comply with the statutory requirements. The Court held that the Council had failed to adequately consider the evidence presented by the Owners and had not properly exercised its discretion in issuing the order. The Court also determined that the order was not proportionate to the risk posed by the premises. As a result, the Court substituted the original order with a new order that better aligned with the statutory provisions. The appeal was therefore upheld, and the Court mandated the substitution of the Council's order to ensure compliance with the Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) The Respondent’s Order dated 5 March 2020, issued in respect of the premises at 110-116 Sussex Street, Sydney NSW 2000 is substituted for the Order at Annexure A pursuant to s 8.18(4)(c) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.