| [2016] FWCA 2781 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
The Otway Fly Pty Ltd t/a Otway Fly Treetop Adventures
(AG2016/2787)
THE OTWAY FLY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Amusement, events and recreation industry | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 5 MAY 2016 |
Application for approval of The Otway Fly Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as The Otway Fly Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by The Otway Fly Pty Ltd t/a Otway Fly Treetop Adventures. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 12 May 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 April 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE418793 PR579974>
- AGLC
- The Otway Fly Pty Ltd t/a Otway Fly Treetop Adventures [2016] FWCA 2781
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 2781
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission involved whether the agreement provided for the mandatory terms set out in the Fair Work Act and whether it had been genuinely negotiated between the employer and the employees. Additionally, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement complied with procedural fairness, including whether the employees had been adequately informed and consulted about the agreement.
The Commission found that the Enterprise Agreement 2016 provided for all the mandatory terms required by the Fair Work Act. It was determined that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated, as evidenced by the submissions and processes followed. The Commission also concluded that the procedural fairness had been observed, with adequate consultation and information provided to the employees. Therefore, the Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement 2016, finding it met all the statutory requirements for approval.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.