[2013] FWCA 7925 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
The Corporation of the Trustees of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Brisbane T/A Brisbane Catholic Education
(AG2013/10645)
BRISBANE CATHOLIC EDUCATION CLERICAL AND ADMINSTRATIVE EMPLOYEES’ ENTERPRISE BARGAINING AGREEMENT 2012-2015
Educational services | |
COMMISSIONER BISSETT | MELBOURNE, 9 OCTOBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Brisbane Catholic Education Clerical and Administration Employees’ Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2012-2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Brisbane Catholic Education Clerical and Administration Employees’ Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2012-2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise Agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Independent Education Union of Australia Queensland and Northern Territory Branch, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) it will operate from 16 October 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code T, AE404680 PR543096>
- AGLC
- The Corporation of the Trustees of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Brisbane T/A Brisbane Catholic Education [2013] FWCA 7925
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 7925
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined the terms of the proposed agreement to ascertain if they provided for a better overall package of pay and conditions. The Commission also considered whether the agreement included provisions that would result in a disbenefit to employees. The Commission had to ensure that the proposed agreement did not include any terms that would disadvantage employees in terms of pay, conditions, or job security. The Commission's decision hinged on a detailed analysis of the proposed agreement's provisions and their implications for the employees.
After thorough deliberation, the Commission found that the proposed agreement did not satisfy the better-off-overall test and contained terms that would result in a disbenefit to employees. Consequently, the Commission refused to approve the agreement. The Commission's decision was grounded in the specific terms of the proposed agreement, which were deemed to fall short of the legal requirements for approval. The Commission's ruling underscored the importance of ensuring that any approved enterprise bargaining agreement genuinely benefits employees and adheres to the statutory criteria for approval.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.