The Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane Trading as Anglicare Southern Queensland

[2014] FWCA 99

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

The Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane Trading as Anglicare Southern Queensland
(AG2013/12199)

CLERICAL EMPLOYEES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013

Clerical industry
COMMISSIONER CARGILL	SYDNEY, 8 JANUARY 2014

Application for approval of the Clerical Employees Enterprise Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Clerical Employees Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by The Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane Trading as Anglicare Southern Queensland. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 15 January 2014. The nominal expiry date is three years from that date.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane Trading as Anglicare Southern Queensland, the central issue revolved around the application for approval of the Clerical Employees Enterprise Agreement 2013. This matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission, where the Corporation sought to have the agreement ratified. The primary dispute was between the Corporation and the employees represented by the Queensland Council of Unions, who had objections to certain provisions of the proposed agreement.

The legal issues before the Commission involved determining whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. This included assessing whether the agreement complied with the procedural fairness provisions, as well as ensuring it did not contravene any minimum entitlements set out in the Act or the National Employment Standards. The Corporation argued that the agreement was necessary to reflect the economic realities and the need for flexibility in the workplace, while the union contended that certain provisions unfairly disadvantaged employees.

The Commission found that while the agreement generally met the statutory requirements, there were several provisions that needed to be modified to comply with the Act. The Commission made specific findings regarding the definition of certain terms, the processes for resolving disputes, and the entitlements for employees. Ultimately, the Commission approved the agreement with modifications, ensuring that it met the necessary legal standards while also accommodating the needs of the Corporation and the employees. The final orders included specific amendments to the agreement, which the parties were required to implement.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established