| [2024] FWC 1953 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union and the Australian Workers' Union
v
Jetwave Marine Services Pty Ltd
(B2024/935)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 25 JULY 2024 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Jetwave Marine Services Pty Ltd
This is an application by the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union and the Australian Workers’ Union (collectively, the Applicants) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Jetwave Marine Services Pty Ltd (Jetwave or Employer).
On 24 July 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer did not object to the Application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declarations of George Gakis and Jsaon Lipscombe, Union Officials, setting out the steps taken by the Applicants in bargaining with the Employer and that they have been, and are, genuinely trying to reach agreement with it, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 8 August 2024.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR777475.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] This is, in effect, 14 days from the making of the Order and was the date sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR777476>
- AGLC
- The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union and the Australian Workers' Union v Jetwave Marine Services Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 1953
- Case
- [2024] FWC 1953
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Deputy President was whether the requirements for a protected action ballot under the Fair Work Act were satisfied. Specifically, the Deputy President needed to ascertain if the notification period for the proposed agreement had been met and if the Applicants had genuinely been attempting to reach an agreement with the Employer. The Deputy President considered the declarations of the Union Officials, George Gakis and Jason Lipscombe, which outlined the steps taken in bargaining and the ongoing efforts to reach an agreement.
The Deputy President was satisfied that the Applicants had fulfilled the requirements of section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act. The Deputy President noted that Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS), the approved ballot agent, would conduct the ballot. The Deputy President also determined the closing date for voting to be 8 August 2024, effectively establishing the ballot period. Additionally, the Deputy President issued an Order for a compulsory conciliation conference to be conducted by another Member of the Commission, requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives. The purpose of this conference was to facilitate meaningful negotiations.
The Deputy President issued an Order granting the Applicants' application for a protected action ballot order. The ballot period was set to close on 8 August 2024, and the compulsory conciliation conference was scheduled to be conducted by another Member of the Commission. This decision aimed to ensure that the parties were prepared to engage in constructive negotiations to reach an agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.