Local Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Christian and Missionary Alliance of Australasia Property Trust v Alameddine [2014] NSWLC 17 Hearing dates: 28/08/2014 Decision date: 02 October 2014 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Magistrate C O'Brien Decision: Orders:
i. Pursuant to s 6(4) of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW), grant leave to the plaintiff to proceed against the third defendant.
ii. That Insurance Australia Limited t/as NRMA Australia (ACN 000 016 722) be joined as the third defendant.
iii. Grant leave to the plaintiff to file an Amended Statement of Claim in the form served on the solicitors for the third defendant on 10 July 2014, such claim to be filed in the Registry within 14 days.
iv. That the default judgment entered against the second defendant on 27 August 2013 be set aside.
v. That costs of the motion are to be costs in the cause.
Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEEDINGS - Notice of Motion - joinder of parties - joinder of insurers - s 51, Insurance Contracts Act - grant of leave under s 6(4), Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 - legislative purpose -principles relevant to the granting of leave - whether there is a viable defendant Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005
Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth)
Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946
Road Transport Act 2013
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005Cases Cited: Bailey v NSW Medical Defence Union Ltd (1995) 184 CLR 399
Bede Polding College v Limit (No. 3) Ltd [2008] NSWSC 887
Energize Fitness Pty Ltd v Vero Insurance [2012] NSWCA 213
General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125
Kinzett v McCourt [1999] NSWCA 7; (1999) 46 NSWLR 32
National Mutual Fire Insurance Company Limited v Commonwealth [1981] 1 NSWLR 400
New South Wales Medical Defence Union Ltd v Crawford (1993) 31 NSWLR 469
Oswald v Bailey (1987) 11 NSWLR 715
Springfield Nominees Pty Ltd v Bridgelands Securities Ltd (1991) ASC 56-033
Tzaidas v Child [2004] NSWCA 252
Zhang v Minox Securities Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 689Texts Cited: C McCarthy, "Third Party Access to Insurance policies and Joinder of Insurers" (1999) 11 Insurance Law Journal 46 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: The Christian and Missionary Alliance of Australasia Property Trust (ACN 46 000 786 023) (applicant/ plaintiff)
Auday Alameddine (first respondent/ first defendant)
Xinlia Ma (aka Xinli Ma) (second respondent/ second defendant)
Insurance Australia Limited (trading as NRMA) (third respondent/ third defendant)Representation: Mr Alexander for the plaintiff/ applicant
Mr Fernie for the first defendant/ first respondent
Mr Carolan for the third defendant/ third respondent
No appearance for second defendant/ second respondent
File Number(s): 2013/145466 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment
Background
On the 14 May 2011, the wall of the plaintiff's property (being the Chinese Alliance Church at 51 Hawkesbury Road, Westmead) was damaged when it was stuck by a motor vehicle. That vehicle was being driven by the first defendant Auday Alameddine ("Alameddine"), and the collision allegedly occurred after Alameddine's vehicle had swerved to…
Continue reading The Christian and Missionary Alliance of Australasia Propert...
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- The Christian and Missionary Alliance of Australasia Property Trust v Alameddine [2014] NSWLC 17
- Case
- [2014] NSWLC 17
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to decide whether to grant leave under section 6(4) of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW) to the plaintiff to proceed against the third defendant and to join Insurance Australia Limited as a defendant. The court also needed to determine whether it was appropriate to set aside the default judgment entered against the second defendant and to allow an amended statement of claim to be filed.
The court found that the legislative purpose of section 6(4) of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act was to allow for the joinder of parties in civil proceedings where it was considered just and convenient to do so. The court considered that it was appropriate to grant leave for the plaintiff to proceed against the third defendant, and to join Insurance Australia Limited as the third defendant, as it was in the interests of justice to do so. The court also found that it was appropriate to set aside the default judgment against the second defendant and to allow an amended statement of claim to be filed, as the plaintiff had demonstrated that there was a viable defendant in the action.
The court granted leave for the plaintiff to proceed against the third defendant and to join Insurance Australia Limited as the third defendant. The court also set aside the default judgment against the second defendant and allowed the plaintiff to file an amended statement of claim. The costs of the motion were to be costs in the cause.
Orders
Orders of the court
Orders:
i. Pursuant to s 6(4) of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW), grant leave to the plaintiff to proceed against the third defendant.
ii. That Insurance Australia Limited t/as NRMA Australia (ACN 000 016 722) be joined as the third defendant.
iii. Grant leave to the plaintiff to file an Amended Statement of Claim in the form served on the solicitors for the third defendant on 10 July 2014, such claim to be filed in the Registry within 14 days.
iv. That the default judgment entered against the second defendant on 27 August 2013 be set aside.
v. That costs of the motion are to be costs in the cause.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.