The Chief Executive, Department of Justice and Attorney General v DJ Stringer Property Services Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2012] QCAT 27
•24 January 2012
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
The Chief Executive, Department of Justice and Attorney General v DJ Stringer Property Services Pty Ltd [2012] QCAT 27
[2012] QCAT 27
24 January 2012
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Chief Executive, Department of Justice and Attorney General has brought proceedings against DJ Stringer Property Services Pty Ltd and its director, David John Stringer, before the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal. The dispute revolves around the agent's drawing of a pre-commission payment, which is prohibited under the Property Agents and Motor Dealers Act 2000. There was no loss to any third party, and the respondent conceded to the breach of the Act.
The primary legal issue was whether the tribunal should impose penalties for the breach of the Act. The respondent admitted to the breach and acknowledged the severity of the offence. The tribunal needed to determine the appropriate penalties for both the company and its director, considering the nature and extent of the breach.
The tribunal decided that the breach was serious, warranting penalties. It issued a reprimand to both DJ Stringer Property Services Pty Ltd and David John Stringer. Additionally, the tribunal ordered DJ Stringer Property Services Pty Ltd to pay a fine of $7,000, equivalent to 70 penalty units, and David John Stringer to pay a fine of $2,000, equivalent to 20 penalty units, within 30 days. Both parties were also ordered to pay the Chief Executive’s costs of the proceedings, amounting to $765, within the same timeframe.
The primary legal issue was whether the tribunal should impose penalties for the breach of the Act. The respondent admitted to the breach and acknowledged the severity of the offence. The tribunal needed to determine the appropriate penalties for both the company and its director, considering the nature and extent of the breach.
The tribunal decided that the breach was serious, warranting penalties. It issued a reprimand to both DJ Stringer Property Services Pty Ltd and David John Stringer. Additionally, the tribunal ordered DJ Stringer Property Services Pty Ltd to pay a fine of $7,000, equivalent to 70 penalty units, and David John Stringer to pay a fine of $2,000, equivalent to 20 penalty units, within 30 days. Both parties were also ordered to pay the Chief Executive’s costs of the proceedings, amounting to $765, within the same timeframe.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Civil Penalty
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Commissioner for Fair Trading v Haider (Occupational Discipline) [2023] ACAT 40
Cases Citing This Decision
18
Yule v Chief Executive, Office of Fair Trading
[2018] QCATA 189
Medical Board of Australia v Nguyen
[2021] QCAT 346
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
0