The Australian Workers' Union v Exide Australia Pty Ltd T/A Exide Technologies

Case

[2012] FWA 6469

31 JULY 2012

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2012] FWA 6469


FAIR WORK AUSTRALIA

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

The Australian Workers' Union
v
Exide Australia Pty Ltd T/A Exide Technologies
(B2012/951)

COMMISSIONER BULL

SYDNEY, 31 JULY 2012

Proposed protected action ballot by employees of Exide Australia Pty Ltd T/A Exide Technologies.

[1] This is an application made pursuant to s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) as a bargaining representative. The application names Exide Technologies as the respondent in this matter. The parties have since advised my Chambers that the true legal entity is Exide Australia Pty Ltd T/A Exide Technologies (the Employer). In accordance with s.586 of the Act, the application is amended to the extent that it reflects the correct legal entity.

[2] The AWU seeks a protected action ballot Order in relation to certain employees of the Employer.

[3] The Employer advised that it does not oppose the application. The matter was listed for hearing on 31 July 2012.

[4] In support of the application, the AWU filed a statement made by Mr Frank Mateos, Branch Official of the AWU.

[5] For the purposes of s.443(1)(b) of the Act, I am satisfied on the basis of the unchallenged position of the AWU, that the AWU has been and is, genuinely trying to reach an agreement with the Employer.

[6] An order [PR527316] based on the draft order provided by the AWU is issued in conjunction with this decision.

COMMISSIONER

Appearances:

F.Mateos for the AWU

G.Shepherdson for Exide Australia Pty Ltd T/A Exide Technologies

Hearing details:

2012
Sydney
31 July

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR527319>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0