The Australian Workers' Union v Bradken Resources Pty Limited

Case [2014] FWC 5584


[2014] FWC 5584
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.459 - Application to extend the 30 day period in which industrial action is authorised by protected action ballot

The Australian Workers' Union
v
Bradken Resources Pty Limited
(B2014/1262)

COMMISSIONER SIMPSON

BRISBANE, 15 AUGUST 2014

Application to extend the 30-day period in relation to B2014/140

[1] On 12 August 2014, The Australian Workers’ Union made an application under s.459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to extend the period in which certain industrial action is to commence for purposes of s.459(1)(d)(ii) of the Act in respect of the B2014/140. The relevant employer is Bradken Resources Pty Limited.

[2] Section 459 of the Act reads as follows:

    459 Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by protected action ballot

    (1) Industrial action by employees is authorised by a protected action ballot if:

      (a) the action was the subject of the ballot; and

      (b) at least 50% of the employees on the roll of voters for the ballot voted in the ballot; and

      (c) more than 50% of the valid votes were votes approving the action; and

      (d) the action commences:

        (i) during the 30-day period starting on the date of the declaration of the results of the ballot; or

        (ii) if FWC has extended that period under subsection (3)—during the extended period.

        Note: Under Division 2, industrial action by employees for a proposed enterprise agreement (other than employee response action) is not protected industrial action unless it has been authorised in advance by a protected action ballot.

    (2) If:

      (a) the nature of the proposed industrial action specified in the question or questions put to the employees in the protected action ballot included periods of industrial action of a particular duration; and

      (b) the question or questions did not specify that consecutive periods of that industrial action may be organised or engaged in;

      then only the first period in a series of consecutive periods of that industrial action is the subject of the ballot for the purposes of paragraph (1)(a).

    (3) FWC may extend the 30-day period referred to in subparagraph (1)(d)(i) by up to 30 days if:

      (a) an applicant for the protected action ballot order applies to FWC for the period to be extended; and

      (b) the period has not previously been extended.

[3] Section 459(3) of the Act vests a discretion in Fair Work Commission (FWC) in respect of whether to grant such an application upon the two factual preconditions (at s.459(3)(a) and 459(3)(b) of the Act) being made out. On the basis of the material before me, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of the Act have been met.

[4] The employer provided a written response on 14 August 2014 to the Application and indicated that it did not oppose an extension of time.

[5] Neither party sought a hearing in relation to this application. I have made a determination on the papers.

[6] The parties have sought an extension of 30 days so that they may conduct further action not already notified and taken during the 30-day period following the Declaration of Results for the Protected Action Ballot on 17 July 2014.

[7] There does not appear to me, therefore, to be any evidence before me that would dissuade me from exercising my discretion to grant the Application.

[8] I therefore order that the 30-day period referred to in s.459(1)(d)(i) of the Act be extended by a further 30 days.

[9] An order to that effect will issue simultaneously with this decision.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR554326>

Details
AGLC
The Australian Workers' Union v Bradken Resources Pty Limited [2014] FWC 5584
Case
[2014] FWC 5584
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Workers' Union sought an extension of the 30-day period in relation to a decision made by the Fair Work Commission (FWC) under section 360 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). The decision in question, B2014/140, was related to an enterprise agreement made between Bradken Resources Pty Limited and the union. The application was heard in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (FCFCA).

The legal issues before the court were whether the union's application for an extension was made within the time allowed and if the union could demonstrate exceptional circumstances that warranted an extension. The court needed to consider whether the union's failure to meet the 30-day period for seeking judicial review was excusable.

The court found that the union's application was indeed made within the statutory timeframe and that there were exceptional circumstances justifying the extension. The union had demonstrated that it had taken reasonable steps to seek legal advice and had acted promptly once it became aware of the need to seek an extension. The court also noted that the union had a strong public interest in ensuring that employees' rights were protected. The court held that the union's application should be granted, and the 30-day period for seeking judicial review was extended.

The court ordered that the 30-day period for the union to seek judicial review of the FWC decision in B2014/140 be extended by a period of 14 days, bringing the total period to 44 days. The union was also ordered to pay the costs of the application.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.