The Australian Maritime Officers' Union v Solstad Australia Pty Ltd T/A Solstad Offshore ASA

Case [2023] FWC 2566


[2023] FWC 2566

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

The Australian Maritime Officers’ Union
v

Solstad Australia Pty Ltd T/A Solstad Offshore ASA

(B2023/1050)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 6 OCTOBER 2023

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Solstad Australia Pty Ltd T/A Solstad Offshore ASA

  1. This is an application by the Australian Maritime Officers’ Union (AMOU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Solstad Australia Pty Ltd T/A Solstad Offshore ASA (Solstad or Employer). 

  1. On 5 October 2023, the Commission was advised that Solstad did not, in effect, object to the Application as amended. Solstad initially raised objections regarding the timeline for the ballot in the proposed Order. Both parties subsequently engaged in discussions and a final agreed timeframe was provided to the Commission later on 5 October 2023. This has been reflected in the ballot period addressed below and the timetable has been forwarded to the relevant ballot agent for its consideration under s.451 of the Act. A change to the wording of clause 3 of the Order was also proposed to parties on 6 October 2023 and neither party objected.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Jarrod Moran, Senior Industrial Officer, setting out the steps taken by the AMOU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Solstad, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.  

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by the Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s 468A of the Act[1] and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 30 October 2023.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. The sequence of Clauses 6 to 9 in the proposed order were rearranged to reflect the Commission’s normal practice.

  1. I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5) of the Act, justifying an extended period of written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking industrial action set out in the Order made by the Commission.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR766876.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives involved in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS [2023] FWC 1400

[2] This is, in effect, sixteen (16) working days from the date effect of the Order, as sought in the amended application after discussion between the parties.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR766875>

Details
AGLC
The Australian Maritime Officers' Union v Solstad Australia Pty Ltd T/A Solstad Offshore ASA [2023] FWC 2566
Case
[2023] FWC 2566
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Maritime Officers' Union (AMOU) sought a protected action ballot order against Solstad Australia Pty Ltd T/A Solstad Offshore ASA (Solstad) under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The AMOU applied for the order to be issued to allow a ballot for potential industrial action by Solstad employees. Solstad did not object to the application, having initially raised concerns about the ballot timeline, which were subsequently resolved through discussions with the AMOU. The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS (CiVS), which is authorised to act as a ballot agent under section 468A of the Act.

The legal issues before the Fair Work Commission included whether the AMOU had fulfilled the requirements for a protected action ballot, specifically if there was a notification period in relation to the proposed agreement and if all conditions under section 443 of the Act had been met. The Commission also needed to determine the appropriate closing date for voting in the ballot and whether there were exceptional circumstances justifying an extended period of written notice for the industrial action.

The Deputy President concluded that the AMOU had met all the requirements for a protected action ballot, as evidenced by the declaration of Mr Jarrod Moran, Senior Industrial Officer, who attested to the union's genuine efforts to reach an agreement with Solstad. The Deputy President set the closing date for voting in the ballot as 30 October 2023, which allows for sixteen working days from the date of effect of the Order. The Deputy President also found that exceptional circumstances existed, justifying an extended period of written notice for the industrial action. A separate order was issued in PR766876 to reflect these findings.

The Fair Work Commission issued an order allowing the protected action ballot to proceed, with voting to close on 30 October 2023. The Commission also assigned the matter to another Member for a compulsory conciliation conference to facilitate negotiations between the AMOU and Solstad.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.