The Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union v Teys Australia Southern Pty Ltd

Case

[2018] FWC 6073

27 SEPTEMBER 2018

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2018] FWC 6073
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.236 - Application for a majority support determination

The Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union
v
Teys Australia Southern Pty Ltd
(B2018/710)

COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE

SYDNEY, 27 SEPTEMBER 2018

Application for a majority support determination.

[1] On 13 August 2018, the Australasian Meat Industry Employees’ Union (the AMIEU) made an application to the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) for a majority support determination pursuant to section 236 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The application sought a determination in respect to members of the AMIEU employed by Teys Australia Southern Pty Ltd (the employer) at its Wagga Wagga site, and who work in all tasks associated with processing livestock including slaughtering, boning, slicing, labouring, packaging, cold storage, storage, cleaning and kindred tasks (relevant employees).

[2] The matter was listed for proceedings before the Commission on 27 August 2018. At these proceedings the AMIEU was represented by Mr J Schultz together with Ms D Sully. The employer was represented by Ms S Taylor, Organisational Development Manager for the employer.

[3] Mr Schultz referred to the material provided with the application as the grounds in support of the making of a majority support determination. Mr Schultz submitted that the copies of the exchange of communications between the AMIEU and the employer which were included with the application, clearly established the recent history of attempts to initiate enterprise bargaining in respect to the relevant employees.

[4] On 30 August 2018, the AMIEU provided the Commission with a petition signed by numerous individuals who were asserted to be relevant employees who had signed the petition indicating that they wanted to bargain for an enterprise agreement with the employer.

[5] On 31 August 2018, the employer provided the Commission with a list of names of all of the relevant employees for the purposes of enabling the Commission to determine whether or not the petition provided by the AMIEU, established that a majority of the relevant employees wanted to bargain for an enterprise agreement with the employer.

[6] The Commission has carefully examined the petition provided by the AMIEU and cross-checked the signatories against the list of relevant employees provided by the employer. Despite the petition containing two apparent duplications, and eight names which cannot be clearly identified, there is nevertheless, a clear majority of identified relevant employees who have signed the petition.

[7] Consequently, the Commission is satisfied that; (a), a majority of the relevant employees want to bargain, and (b), the employer has not yet agreed to bargain, and (c), the group that comprises the relevant employees has been fairly chosen taking into account the geographical, operational and organisational distinction of that group, and (d), that it is reasonable in all circumstances to make the majority support determination. Therefore the relevant requirements of ss. 236 and 237 of the Act have been met and the application must be granted.

[8] Consequently, the Commission has separately issued a majority support determination.

[9] This majority support determination operates on and from today, 27 September 2018.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR700908>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0