The Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia v Melbourne City Council

[2016] FWC 6270

[2016] FWC 6270

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.437—Protected action

The Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia
v
Melbourne City Council
(B2016/944)

COMMISSIONER BISSETT MELBOURNE, 2 SEPTEMBER 2016

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Melbourne City Council.

[1] This is an application pursuant to s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (theAct) by the Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia (APESMA) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Melbourne City Council (the Respondent). The application was made on 31 August 2016.

[2] The Respondent has advised in correspondence that it does not oppose the making of the order. I have therefore made this decision on the basis of the material filed by APESMA.

[3] Section 443(1) of the Act states:

443 When the FWC must make a protected action ballot order

(1) The FWC must make a protected action ballot order in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement if:

(a) an application has been made under section 437; and

(b) the FWC is satisfied that each applicant has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach an agreement with the employer of the employees who are to be balloted.

[4] APESMA has provided a signed statutory declaration addressing those matters in s.443(1) of the Act.
[5] I am satisfied that the requirements of s.443(1) of the Act have been met and that, accordingly, the Order must be made.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR584955>