The Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia v Ausgrid Management Pty Ltd t/a Ausgrid
[2017] FWC 6186
•24 NOVEMBER 2017
| [2017] FWC 6186 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
REASONS FOR DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s 437—Protected action
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia; CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union; Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union; The Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia
v
Ausgrid Management Pty Ltd t/a Ausgrid
(B2017/1115)
DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS | SYDNEY, 24 NOVEMBER 2017 |
Protected action ballot of employees of Ausgrid Management Pty Ltd t/a Ausgrid.
[1] This is an application, pursuant to s 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (‘the Act’) for a protected action ballot order in respect to certain members of the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU), CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU), the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU) and The Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia (Professionals Australia) (together ‘the Unions’) employed by Ausgrid Management Pty Ltd t/a Ausgrid (‘the employer’).
[2] The Unions seek to ballot those employees of the employer whose employment is currently covered by the existing enterprise agreement, who are members of the CEPU, the CPSU, Professionals Australia or the ASU who would be subject to the proposed enterprise agreement and for whom the CEPU, the CPSU, Professionals Australia or the ASU is the relevant bargaining representative.
[3] The relevant statutory provisions governing this application are set out at s 443 of the Act as follows:
‘443 When the FWC must make a protected action ballot order
(1) The FWC must make a protected action ballot order in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement if:
(a) an application has been made under section 437; and
(b) the FWC is satisfied that each applicant has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach an agreement with the employer of the employees who are to be balloted.
(2) The FWC must not make a protected action ballot order in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement except in the circumstances referred to in subsection (1).
(3) A protected action ballot order must specify the following:
(a) the name of each applicant for the order;
(b) the group or groups of employees who are to be balloted;
(c) the date by which voting in the protected action ballot closes;
(d) the question or questions to be put to the employees who are to be balloted, including the nature of the proposed industrial action.
(3A) For the purposes of paragraph (3)(c), the FWC must specify a date that will enable the protected action ballot to be conducted as expeditiously as practicable.
(4) If the FWC decides that a person other than the Australian Electoral Commission is to be the protected action ballot agent for the protected action ballot, the protected action ballot order must also specify:
(a) the person that the FWC decides, under subsection 444(1), is to be the protected action ballot agent; and
(b) the person (if any) that the FWC decides, under subsection 444(3), is to be the independent advisor for the ballot.’
[4] The Fair Work Commission (the ‘Commission’) was advised on 22 November 2017 that the Unions and employer had been in negotiations. The outcome of those negotiations was that the employer did not oppose the making of the proposed order, as long as it provided for five working days’ notice of employee claim action for the purposes of s 414(2)(b) of the Act. An amended draft order reflecting this was subsequently filed. In these circumstances, I have determined the matter ‘on the papers’. I am satisfied that the application has been made in accordance with the requirements of s 437 of the Act and that the Unions are genuinely trying to reach an agreement with the employer.
[5] Given that I am satisfied that s 443(1)(a) and (b) have been complied with, the Commission must make the protected action ballot order, as sought by the Unions. For the above reasons, the order 1 was issued yesterday, 23 November 2017.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
1 PR597999.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR598001>
0
0
0