Thales Australia Limited

Case

[2013] FWCA 6575

5 SEPTEMBER 2013

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2013] FWCA 6575

The attached document replaces the document previously issued with the above code on 5 September 2013.

To correct a typographical error

Bronwyn Brown

Associate to Deputy President Lawrence

Dated 5 September 2013

[2013] FWCA 6575

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Thales Australia Limited
(AG2013/2243)

THALES AUSTRALIA, LITHGOW ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012

Manufacturing and associated industries

DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAWRENCE

SYDNEY, 5 SEPTEMBER 2013

Application for approval of the Thales Australia, Lithgow Enterprise Agreement 2012.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Thales Australia, Lithgow Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) .The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The National Union of Workers, the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU), the Australian Workers’ Union, the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. As required by s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers those organisations.

[4] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) it will operate from 12 September 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is30 September 2015.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code J, AE403740  PR541274>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0