FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| TGN & TMW | [2002] FMCAfam 250 |
| FAMILY LAW – Child support – departure order – taxable income not actual income – school fees – orthodontic expenses. |
| Applicant: | TGN |
| Respondent: | TMW |
| File No: | (P)MLM 9804 of 2001 |
| Delivered on: | 14 August 2002 |
| Delivered at: | Melbourne |
| Hearing Date: | 8 March 2002 |
| Judgment of: | Walters FM |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Ms Stewart |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Mason Sier Turnball |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Mr Ramsey |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Anderson Partners |
ORDERS
There is to be a departure from all relevant administrative assessments of child support for the period 1 July 2000 to 4 August 2003, in such a manner as to provide for the variation of the annual rate of child support payable by the husband from $4,128.00 per annum (or such other annual amount as may have been determined from time to time) to the amount of $15,000.00 per annum.
There is to be a further departure from all relevant administrative assessments of child support for the period 8 March 2002 to 8 August 2003, to the effect that the husband provide child support for the children otherwise than in the form of periodic amounts paid to the wife — such child support to comprise the following:
(a)payment by the husband of one half of the School Costs (as I have defined them) and dental expenses; and
(b)payment by the husband of the whole of the orthodontic expenses for the child J.
The order referred to in (b) above is an order under section 124 of the Assessment Act, and the child support to be provided by the husband pursuant to it is not to be credited against the husband’s liability under any relevant assessment.
The order for the indemnity sought by the wife is to be made by consent.
Counsel will be heard as to the precise terms of the orders that will be required to give effect to the within Judgment.
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT MELBOURNE |
(P)MLM 9804 of 2001
| TGN |
Applicant
And
| TMW |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
Before the Court is the wife’s application for departure from the current administrative assessment of child support payable by the husband for the two children of the marriage, A born 8 August 1985 (now aged 17) and J born 12 December 1987 (now aged 14).
The wife’s form 63 application was filed on 12 December 2001. The orders sought by the wife were not stated with precision in her application. It is clear from the submissions filed on her behalf, however, that the orders now sought by her are as follows:
a)There be a departure from administrative assessment for the period 30 June 1999 to 8 March 2004 as follows:
i)the annual rate payable by way of periodic support be fixed at $15,000.00 per annum;
ii)the husband pay one half of the children’s school, extra curricular and dental expenses, such payments to be made within 7 days of the provision of a…
Continue reading TGN and TMW
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- TGN and TMW [2002] FMCAfam 250
- Case
- [2002] FMCAfam 250
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the husband's proposal for varying the annual child support rate was reasonable, and if the direct payment of certain expenses could be accepted in lieu of the periodic payments to the wife. Furthermore, it had to decide whether the husband's proposed direct payments could be made without affecting his liability under the relevant child support assessments.
In its judgment, the court found that the husband's proposed variation of the annual child support rate was reasonable and accepted his proposal for direct payments towards specified expenses. The court also ruled that the direct payments should not affect the husband's liability under the assessments. Consequently, the court ordered a departure from the administrative assessments to reflect the new annual rate of $15,000.00 and mandated that the husband cover half of the school costs and dental expenses, as well as the full orthodontic expenses for one child, without these payments being credited against his child support liability. The court also accepted the wife's indemnity claim by consent. The final orders were to be determined after further submissions from counsel on the precise terms required to implement the judgment.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
There is to be a departure from all relevant administrative assessments of child support for the period 1 July 2000 to 4 August 2003, in such a manner as to provide for the variation of the annual rate of child support payable by the husband from $4,128.00 per annum (or such other annual amount as may have been determined from time to time) to the amount of $15,000.00 per annum.
2.
There is to be a further departure from all relevant administrative assessments of child support for the period 8 March 2002 to 8 August 2003, to the effect that the husband provide child support for the children otherwise than in the form of periodic amounts paid to the wife — such child support to comprise the following:
(a) payment by the husband of one half of the School Costs (as I have defined them) and dental expenses; and
(b) payment by the husband of the whole of the orthodontic expenses for the child J.
3.
The order referred to in (b) above is an order under section 124 of the Assessment Act, and the child support to be provided by the husband pursuant to it is not to be credited against the husband’s liability under any relevant assessment.
4.
The order for the indemnity sought by the wife is to be made by consent.
5.
Counsel will be heard as to the precise terms of the orders that will be required to give effect to the within Judgment.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.