Teys Australia Southern Pty Ltd

Case

[2014] FWCA 745

27 FEBRUARY 2014

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2014] FWCA 745

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.217 - Application to vary an agreement to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty

Teys Australia Southern Pty Ltd
(AG2014/3442)

TEYS AUSTRALIA SOUTHERN PTY LTD TAMWORTH PRODUCTION DEPARTMENTS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012

Meat Industry

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HARRISON

SYDNEY, 27 FEBRUARY 2014

Application for variation of the Teys Australia Southern Pty Ltd Tamworth Production Departments Enterprise Agreement 2012.

[1] An application has been made by Teys Australia Southern Pty Ltd (the Applicant) to vary the Teys Australia Southern Pty Ltd Tamworth Production Departments Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.217 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

[2] Clause 3.8 of the Agreement, which is titled ‘Wage Increases’ states:

    “The wage rates and monetary allowances specified in sub-clause 3.1.1 reflect, on average, a 4.3% wage increase across all classifications and those rates will be the subject of a further general wage increase of 4% in the first pay period of January 2014 and by a further 4% in the first pay period in January 2014 - (see Appendix 2). ...”

[3] The Applicant seeks to vary clause 3.8 of the Agreement by deleting the second reference to “2014” and replacing it with “2015”. In its application, the Applicant states that this is the result of a typographical error.

[4] The Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union, Newcastle and Northern Branch is covered by the Agreement. I note that it does not oppose the application.

[5] I am satisfied that the relevant legislative requirements have been met. The application is granted. A consolidated agreement containing the variation is published with this decision. The variation operates from 27 February 2014.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AE899701  PR547302>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0