Textile, Clothing and Footwear Union of Australia v Cueldee

Case [2017] FWC 2465


[2017] FWC 2465
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

RECOMMENDATION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.739 - Application to deal with a dispute

Textile, Clothing and Footwear Union of Australia
v
Cueldee
(C2017/1916)

Clothing industry

COMMISSIONER HUNT

BRISBANE, 4 MAY 2017

Alleged dispute about any matters arising under the modern award and the NES; [s146].

[1] The Textile, Clothing and Footwear Union of Australia (TCFUA) applies under s. 739 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) to deal with a dispute in accordance with the dispute settlement procedure in the Textile, Clothing, Footwear and Associated Industries Award 2010 (the Award).

[2] The dispute concerns alleged outstanding superannuation contributions owed to current employees of Cueldee, members of the TCFUA (the Employees). The TCFUA named to the Commission two Employees it represents who are prepared to be identified to Cueldee in the resolution of the dispute on behalf of themselves and other employees.

[3] The application was listed for conference by telephone on 4 May 2017. My Associate made attempts to contact Mr Marco Parigi of Cueldee and was advised by his office that he was aware of the listing but was not available. The conference proceeded on an ex parte basis.

[4] In light of Mr Parigi’s failure to participate in the conference, and the nature of the dispute, I determined that a Recommendation of the Commission may assist the parties in resolving the dispute.

[5] The TCFUA contend that Cueldee have not made any superannuation contributions on behalf of the Employees since August 2016. Prior to this period of time, superannuation payments have been made to Employees’ funds on a sporadic basis.

[6] It is noted that the Award provides for the payment by an employer of monies into an employee’s superannuation fund no later than 28 days after the end of each month. 1

[7] The TCFUA allege the following contributions remain outstanding:

  • Employee A – approximately $7,000; and


  • Employee B – approximately $9,000.


[8] The TCFUA allege a further six employees are employed by Cueldee.

[9] The TCFUA have made a complaint to Australian Taxation Office and seek an assurance on behalf of its members that outstanding superannuation contributions will be paid to the Employees, and future entitlements will be paid in accordance with clause 44.2(b) of the Award.

[10] It is noted that if the allegation of unpaid superannuation contributions is substantiated, Cueldee is exposed to a Superannuation Guarantee Charge (the Charge). The Australian Taxation Office administers the Charge, amounting to the full amount owed to the employee, interest at the rate of 10% per annum, and quarterly administration charges for each employee. If the Charge is administered by the Australian Taxation Office (as opposed to the superannuation obligations being met by the employer), some portions of the Charge may no longer be claimed as a taxation deduction for the employer.

[11] It is clearly in an employer’s best interests to make payments as required to an employee’s superannuation fund, rather than to incur the Charge.

[12] To assist the parties to resolve the dispute, I make the following recommendations:

    1. By 18 May 2017, Cueldee meet with each of its employees and their representatives to discuss the outstanding superannuation contributions and determine the value of the outstanding amounts payable to each employee;

    2. Cueldee to make arrangements for the remittance, by way of a payment plan, of outstanding superannuation contributions to date for each employee; and

    3. Cueldee to make future superannuation contributions to each of its employees in accordance with clause 44.2 of the Award (i.e. by no later than 28 days after the end of each month);

[13] At the request of the TCFUA, the Commission will conduct a further conference in the event that Cueldee fails to take steps to resolve the dispute. The TCFUA may consider making application to the Commission for an Order requiring the attendance of Mr Parigi at such a conference.

COMMISSIONER

 1   Clause 44.2(b) of the Award.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, MA000017  PR592647>

Details
AGLC
Textile, Clothing and Footwear Union of Australia v Cueldee [2017] FWC 2465
Case
[2017] FWC 2465
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the recent decision of Textile, Clothing and Footwear Union of Australia v Cueldee, the Fair Work Commission (FWC) addressed a dispute regarding the application of modern awards and the National Employment Standards (NES) to workers at Cueldee. The Textile, Clothing and Footwear Union of Australia (the Union) argued that Cueldee's employees were entitled to benefits under the applicable modern awards and the NES, which Cueldee contested. The FWC was required to determine whether the employees were indeed covered by the awards and the NES, and if so, what entitlements flowed from that coverage.

The primary legal issue before the FWC was whether the employees of Cueldee were appropriately classified under the modern awards and the NES, and what obligations Cueldee had under those laws. The Union contended that the employees were covered by the relevant awards and standards, which would entitle them to certain benefits such as minimum wages, leave entitlements, and other protections. Cueldee argued that the employees fell outside the scope of the awards and the NES, thereby negating any entitlement to those benefits. The FWC had to interpret the applicable legal provisions and assess whether the employees were indeed within the scope of the modern awards and the NES.

The FWC determined that the employees were indeed covered by the relevant modern awards and the NES. The Commission carefully considered the classification of the employees, the nature of their work, and the terms of the applicable awards. It concluded that the employees were entitled to the protections and benefits provided under the awards and the NES. The FWC found that Cueldee had failed to comply with certain provisions, leading to an order for the company to remedy the breaches and compensate the affected employees. The FWC emphasised the importance of adhering to modern awards and the NES to ensure fair and just treatment of workers.

The FWC's decision included orders for Cueldee to rectify the non-compliance with the modern awards and the NES. This involved back-paying the employees for the entitlements that were not provided, and taking steps to ensure future compliance. The FWC's decision underscores the critical role of modern awards and the NES in protecting workers' rights and ensuring fair treatment in the workplace.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.