Tetra Pak International AB v J. GADSDEN PTY. Ltd

Case

[1992] APO 62

26 October 1992

No judgment structure available for this case.

official notice

decision of a delegate of the commissioner of patents

Application        :    No. 530946 in the name of TETRA PAK INTERNATIONAL AB

Title:    Machine for the Application of Suction Tubes to Packing Containers

Action: S 59 0pposition by J. GADSDEN PTY. LTD.; final decision following amendments

Decision:    Issued            .  Clarity (see previous decision dated 10 November 1987), application amended, amendments allowed and application to proceed to sealing.

patents act 1990

decision of a delegate of the commissioner of patents

Re:Patent Application No. 530946 TETRA PAK INTERNATIONAL AB and Opposition by J. GADSDEN PTY. LTD. under section 59 of the Patents Act 1952

background

In his decision in this matter dated 10 November 1987, the delegate found that, while the opposition was not successful, the specification did not satisfy section 40.  The delegate afforded the applicant an opportunity to amend its specification to overcome this deficiency.

The applicant duly filed a request to amend on 23 November 1987.  Following examination action, the request was advertised in the Official Journal on 13 July 1989.  In the absence of opposition, this request was allowed on 8 February 1990 and the specification amended at that time in accordance with the request.

In accordance with office practice, the opponent was invited to comment on the application as amended, but did not respond within the time allocated.  I am therefore in a position to finalize the opposition.

DECISION

I am satisfied that the amendments to the complete specification remove the defect which the delegate found in his earlier decision.  Therefore, I direct that the application and complete specification as amended proceed to sealing.

LEO J. O'KEEFFE
Delegate of the Commissioner of Patents

Patent attorneys for the applicant: Watermark Patent & Trademark Attorneys, Melbourne

Patent attorneys for the opponent : Phillips Ormonde & Fitzpatrick, Melbourne

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0