Terry & Terry

Case [2023] FedCFamC2F 1674


FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

(DIVISION 2)

Terry & Terry [2023] FedCFamC2F 1674

File number: MLC 10595 of 2023
Judgment of: JUDGE CHAMPION
Date of judgment: 20 December 2023 
Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – Parenting – Rice & Asplund – Preliminary hearing as to whether parenting orders ought to be reconsidered – No change of circumstances that would justify embarking on a second contested parenting hearing – Application dismissed – Discrete issue as to dispute as to choice of school referred to separate hearing
Legislation:

Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s. 131

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss. 64B, 65DAC

Cases cited:

Cameron & Brook [2018] FamCAFC 175

Defrey & Radnor [2021] FamCAFC 67

Edwards & Edwards (2006) FLC 93-306

King & Finneran (2001) FLC 93-079; [2001] FamCA 344

Mahoney v Dieter [2020] FamCAFC 88

Marsden & Winch (2009) 42 Fam LR 1; [2009] Fam CAFC 152

Rice & Asplund (1979) FLC 90-275

Searson & Searson (2017) FLC 93-788

SPS & PLS (2008) 217 FLR 164

Division: Division 2 Family Law
Number of paragraphs: 75
Date of last submissions: 15 December 2023
Date of hearing: 15 December 2023
Place: Melbourne
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Bennett
Solicitor for the Applicant: ECG Legal
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Moore
Solicitor for the Respondent: Duffy and Simon

ORDERS

MLC 10595 of 2023

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 2)

BETWEEN:

MR TERRY

Applicant

AND:

MS TERRY

Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

JUDGE CHAMPION

DATE OF ORDER:

20 DECEMBER 2023

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.Subject to Orders 2 to 4, the initiating application is dismissed.

The school dispute

2.The Father file an outline of argument, a consolidated affidavit and any further affidavit in support of the orders he seeks as to the school dispute on or before 4:00 pm on 8 January 2024.

3.The Mother file an outline of argument, a consolidated affidavit and any further affidavit in support of the orders she seeks as to the school dispute on or before 4:00 pm on 12 January 2024.

4.The matter is listed for a hearing at 10:00 am on 18 January 2024 (on an estimate of 1 day).

Note:   The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).

Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under a pseudonym has been approved pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

JUDGE CHAMPION:

INTRODUCTION

  1. This dispute concerns…

Continue reading Terry & Terry

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Terry & Terry [2023] FedCFamC2F 1674
Case
[2023] FedCFamC2F 1674
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Mr Terry filed an application under Division 2 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) seeking reconsideration of existing parenting orders regarding his child with Ms Terry. The matter was heard in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. The primary concern was whether there had been a change in circumstances that warranted a second contested parenting hearing. Additionally, there was a discrete issue concerning the dispute over the choice of school for the child, which the court directed to a separate hearing.

The court examined the evidence presented and concluded that there had not been a significant change in circumstances that would justify a new contested hearing. The court found that the existing parenting orders remained appropriate given the current situation of the parties. However, the dispute regarding the choice of school for the child was deemed a separate issue and was directed to a specific hearing date. The court dismissed the application for reconsideration of the parenting orders but ordered that both parties prepare and file their respective outlines of argument, consolidated affidavits, and any further affidavits in relation to the school dispute by specified dates.

The court ordered that the initiating application for reconsideration of parenting orders be dismissed, subject to the filing of further documentation and a separate hearing regarding the school dispute. The father was required to file his outline of argument, consolidated affidavit, and any further affidavits by 4:00 pm on 8 January 2024. The mother was required to file her outline of argument, consolidated affidavit, and any further affidavits by 4:00 pm on 12 January 2024. The matter concerning the school dispute was listed for a hearing at 10:00 am on 18 January 2024, estimated to take one day. The form of the order was subject to review and potential variation as per the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).

Orders

Orders of the court

MLC 10595 of 2023

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 2)

BETWEEN:

MR TERRY

Applicant

AND:

MS TERRY

Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

JUDGE CHAMPION

DATE OF ORDER:

20 DECEMBER 2023

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. Subject to Orders 2 to 4, the initiating application is dismissed.

The school dispute

2. The Father file an outline of argument, a consolidated affidavit and any further affidavit in support of the orders he seeks as to the school dispute on or before 4:00 pm on 8 January 2024.

3. The Mother file an outline of argument, a consolidated affidavit and any further affidavit in support of the orders she seeks as to the school dispute on or before 4:00 pm on 12 January 2024.

4. The matter is listed for a hearing at 10:00 am on 18 January 2024 (on an estimate of 1 day).

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).

Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.