FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
(DIVISION 2)
Terry & Terry [2023] FedCFamC2F 1674
File number: MLC 10595 of 2023 Judgment of: JUDGE CHAMPION Date of judgment: 20 December 2023 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – Parenting – Rice & Asplund – Preliminary hearing as to whether parenting orders ought to be reconsidered – No change of circumstances that would justify embarking on a second contested parenting hearing – Application dismissed – Discrete issue as to dispute as to choice of school referred to separate hearing Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s. 131
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss. 64B, 65DAC
Cases cited: Cameron & Brook [2018] FamCAFC 175
Defrey & Radnor [2021] FamCAFC 67
Edwards & Edwards (2006) FLC 93-306
King & Finneran (2001) FLC 93-079; [2001] FamCA 344
Mahoney v Dieter [2020] FamCAFC 88
Marsden & Winch (2009) 42 Fam LR 1; [2009] Fam CAFC 152
Rice & Asplund (1979) FLC 90-275
Searson & Searson (2017) FLC 93-788
SPS & PLS (2008) 217 FLR 164
Division: Division 2 Family Law Number of paragraphs: 75 Date of last submissions: 15 December 2023 Date of hearing: 15 December 2023 Place: Melbourne Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Bennett Solicitor for the Applicant: ECG Legal Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Moore Solicitor for the Respondent: Duffy and Simon ORDERS
MLC 10595 of 2023 FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 2)
BETWEEN: MR TERRY
Applicant
AND: MS TERRY
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
JUDGE CHAMPION
DATE OF ORDER:
20 DECEMBER 2023
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Subject to Orders 2 to 4, the initiating application is dismissed.
The school dispute
2.The Father file an outline of argument, a consolidated affidavit and any further affidavit in support of the orders he seeks as to the school dispute on or before 4:00 pm on 8 January 2024.
3.The Mother file an outline of argument, a consolidated affidavit and any further affidavit in support of the orders she seeks as to the school dispute on or before 4:00 pm on 12 January 2024.
4.The matter is listed for a hearing at 10:00 am on 18 January 2024 (on an estimate of 1 day).
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).
Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under a pseudonym has been approved pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
JUDGE CHAMPION:
INTRODUCTION
This dispute concerns…
Continue reading Terry & Terry
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Terry & Terry [2023] FedCFamC2F 1674
- Case
- [2023] FedCFamC2F 1674
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the evidence presented and concluded that there had not been a significant change in circumstances that would justify a new contested hearing. The court found that the existing parenting orders remained appropriate given the current situation of the parties. However, the dispute regarding the choice of school for the child was deemed a separate issue and was directed to a specific hearing date. The court dismissed the application for reconsideration of the parenting orders but ordered that both parties prepare and file their respective outlines of argument, consolidated affidavits, and any further affidavits in relation to the school dispute by specified dates.
The court ordered that the initiating application for reconsideration of parenting orders be dismissed, subject to the filing of further documentation and a separate hearing regarding the school dispute. The father was required to file his outline of argument, consolidated affidavit, and any further affidavits by 4:00 pm on 8 January 2024. The mother was required to file her outline of argument, consolidated affidavit, and any further affidavits by 4:00 pm on 12 January 2024. The matter concerning the school dispute was listed for a hearing at 10:00 am on 18 January 2024, estimated to take one day. The form of the order was subject to review and potential variation as per the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).
Orders
Orders of the court
MLC 10595 of 2023
FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 2)
BETWEEN:
MR TERRY
Applicant
AND:
MS TERRY
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
JUDGE CHAMPION
DATE OF ORDER:
20 DECEMBER 2023
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Subject to Orders 2 to 4, the initiating application is dismissed.
The school dispute
2. The Father file an outline of argument, a consolidated affidavit and any further affidavit in support of the orders he seeks as to the school dispute on or before 4:00 pm on 8 January 2024.
3. The Mother file an outline of argument, a consolidated affidavit and any further affidavit in support of the orders she seeks as to the school dispute on or before 4:00 pm on 12 January 2024.
4. The matter is listed for a hearing at 10:00 am on 18 January 2024 (on an estimate of 1 day).
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).
Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.