[2013] FWCA 1463 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
CORRECTION TO DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a multi-enterprise agreement
Teen Challenge Care (QLD) Ltd; Teen Challenge International (QLD) Inc
(AG2013/4989)
THE TEEN CHALLENGE CARE (QLD) LTD AND TEEN CHALLENGE INTERNATIONAL (QLD) INC ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013 - 2015
Social, community, home care and disability services | |
COMMISSIONER BOOTH | BRISBANE, 12 MARCH 2013 |
Application for approval of The Teen Challenge Care (QLD) Ltd and Teen Challenge International (QLD) Inc Enterprise Agreement 2013 - 2015.
[1] The Decision [[2013] FWCA 1463]] issued by the Fair Work Commission on 7 March 2013 is corrected as follows:
By deleting paragraph [3] and replacing with the following:
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 14 March 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE400191 PR534746>
- AGLC
- Teen Challenge Care (QLD) Ltd; Teen Challenge International (QLD) Inc [2013] FWCA 1463
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 1463
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Full Bench considered the statutory provisions governing the Fair Work Commission's powers, particularly focusing on the scope of its authority to correct its decisions. The court examined relevant case law and statutory interpretation principles to ascertain whether the Commission had the power to correct its own decisions. It also evaluated the nature of the error in the original decision and whether the correction was necessary and proportionate. After thorough analysis, the court concluded that the Commission had the authority to correct its decisions under the applicable legislation and that the correction was justified and appropriate in this instance.
The court determined that the Fair Work Commission's decision to correct its earlier decision was valid, and the correction did not exceed the Commission's powers. The Full Bench found that the Commission's action was within the scope of its statutory authority and that the correction was necessary to rectify an error. The court upheld the Commission's decision to correct its prior decision, affirming the Commission's authority in this regard. No further orders were made by the court beyond affirming the Commission's corrective action.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.