[2013] FWCA 3791 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement
Team Engineering Services Pty Ltd
(AG2013/1388)
TEAM ENGINEERING SERVICES PTY LTD CAVAL RIDGE PROJECT UNION GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS | BRISBANE, 14 JUNE 2013 |
Application for approval of the Team Engineering Services Pty Ltd Caval Ridge Project Union Greenfields Agreement.
[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 4 June 2013 by Team Engineering Services Pty Ltd for the approval of a Greenfields agreement known as the Team Engineering Services Pty Ltd Caval Ridge Project Union Greenfields Agreement(“the Agreement”).
[2] Statutory declarations were provided by:
- Mr P. Close, Assistant Divisional Branch Secretary, of the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (“the CFMEU”);
- Mr R. Webb, State Secretary, of the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (“the AMWU”); and
- Mr P. Simpson, Divisional Branch Secretary, of the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (“the CEPU”).
[1] In light of these statutory declarations and in accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the CFMEU, AMWU and CEPU are entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it and that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[2] On 14 June 2013 the Employer provided an undertaking to the Fair Work Commission. This undertaking is attached to and taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[3] In light of the Employer’s undertaking, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The consultation clause does not conform with s.205(1)(b) of the Act. Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE401778 PR537831>
- AGLC
- Team Engineering Services Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 3791
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 3791
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the commission was whether the proposed agreement met the requirements set out in the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly in terms of its capacity to provide fair and reasonable terms of employment, and its adherence to the principles of good faith bargaining. The commission had to assess whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated between the parties and whether it offered a fair and reasonable balance of benefits and obligations for the employees.
The Fair Work Commission determined that the agreement was genuinely negotiated and met the criteria outlined in the Fair Work Act. The commission noted that the agreement provided a fair and reasonable balance of benefits and obligations for the employees, taking into account the specific context of the Caval Ridge Project. The CFMEU's concerns regarding the agreement's implications for employee rights and working conditions were addressed through the provisions of the agreement, which were deemed to be fair and reasonable. As a result, the commission approved the Team Engineering Services Pty Ltd Caval Ridge Project Union Greenfields Agreement.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Team Engineering Services Pty Ltd Caval Ridge Project Union Greenfields Agreement, acknowledging its compliance with the Fair Work Act and the principles of good faith bargaining. The agreement was found to offer fair and reasonable terms of employment for the employees involved in the Caval Ridge Project.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.