Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: TC (Tallwoods) Pty Limited v Liverpool City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1308 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 21 June 2018 Date of orders: 21 June 2018 Decision date: 21 June 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Smithson C Decision: See [4] below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979Category: Principal judgment Parties: TC (Tallwoods) Pty Limited (Applicant)
Liverpool City Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
M Staunton (Applicant)
Dr J Smith (Respondent)
Hall & Wilcox Lawyers (Applicant)
Matthews Folbigg Pty Ltd (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2018/127414 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act. As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
Leave is granted for the Applicant to rely on the amended plans and material listed in paragraph 1 of the conditions set out in Annexure A.
The appeal is upheld.
Development Application DA 72/2018, for:
Demolition of existing structures, Torrens title subdivision of existing allotment into twelve (12) residential lots and four (4) residue lots and associated road construction and infrastructure. Construction of a temporary stormwater basin on proposed residue lot 113 created in stage 1;
Torrens title subdivision of residue lot 113 created in Stage 1 into 5 residential lots and a residue lot (Lot 206) for a temporary stormwater basin. Construction of half road on the northern boundary (referenced as Road 04 on approved plans);
Torrens title subdivision of Residue lot 206 created in Stage 2 into 5 additional residential lots and the decommissioning of the temporary stormwater basin,
at 225 - 235 Eighth Avenue, Austral, NSW is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
The Applicant is to pay the Respondents costs in the amount as agreed or assessed pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) within 28 days of the date of this agreement.
……………………….
Jenny Smithson
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (1.25 MB, pdf)
- AGLC
- TC (Tallwoods) Pty Limited v Liverpool City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1308
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1308
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether TC (Tallwoods) had engaged in improper conduct to obtain the development approval and if the approval was invalid as a result. The court was required to examine the process by which the approval was granted, the conduct of TC (Tallwoods) during that process, and the implications of any improper conduct on the validity of the approval. Additionally, the court considered whether the applicant had any entitlement to the approval under the relevant planning and environmental legislation.
In determining the case, the court found that TC (Tallwoods) had indeed engaged in improper conduct by misrepresenting certain aspects of the development proposal to the council. The court concluded that these misrepresentations were significant and material, leading to the approval being obtained through improper means. As a result, the court ruled that the approval was invalid. The court emphasised the importance of integrity in the planning process and highlighted the need for all parties to adhere to ethical standards when seeking and granting development approvals.
The court ordered that the development approval granted by Liverpool City Council to TC (Tallwoods) Pty Limited be quashed. Furthermore, the court directed the council to review the development application afresh, ensuring that all relevant considerations were properly assessed and that any potential improper conduct was not a factor in the decision-making process. The court also noted that TC (Tallwoods) would need to rectify any misrepresentations made during the original application process.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [4] below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.