Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Statutory Material Cited
0
-
Hancock v Rinehart (Costs)
[2016] NSWSC 11
Citation 1
…eeding – defendant successful on some claims, unsuccessful on the others – whether costs should be apportioned – Hancock v Rinehart (Costs) [2016] NSWSC 11 – general discretion on costs – costs apportioned – turns on own facts PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – COSTS – CALDERBANK OFFER – whether plaintiff unreasonably rejec…
-
Ramsay v Pigram
[1968] HCA 34
Citation 2
…lor. As was said by Dixon J in Blair v. Curran [(1939) 62 CLR 464 at 531. ‘Privies’ includes privies by title: see Ramsay v. Pigram (1968) 118 CLR 271 at 279]: A judicial determination directly involving an issue of fact or of law disposes once for all of the issue, so that it cannot afterwards be raised between the…
-
Blair v Curran
[1939] HCA 23
Citation 3
…iolated that right. That finding has established a property right that was denied by Taylor. As was said by Dixon J in Blair v. Curran [(1939) 62 CLR 464 at 531. ‘Privies’ includes privies by title: see Ramsay v. Pigram (1968) 118 CLR 271 at 279]: A judicial determination directly involving an issue of fact or of la…
-
Taylor v Harrison
[2021] VCC 2097
Citation 4
…1On 17 December 2021, I delivered judgment in this proceeding: Taylor v Harrison [2021] VCC 2097 ( the judgment ). This decision follows from the judgment, and concerns the costs order that should be made in the proceeding. It raises issues of whether costs should be apportioned, and the effect of a Calderbank off…