Tayla Hawkins v St Barsoum Pty Ltd

[2020] FWC 6166

[2020] FWC 6166

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.394—Unfair dismissal

Tayla Hawkins
v
St Barsoum Pty Ltd
(U2020/12739)

VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI SYDNEY, 17 NOVEMBER 2020

Application for an unfair dismissal remedy.

[1] On 22 September 2020, Tayla Hawkins made an application for a remedy for unfair dismissal under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). Ms Hawkins states she was employed by “St Barsoum Pty Ltd” from 1 March 2020 to 17 September 2020.

[1] On 19 October 2020, Manal Atta T/A Munchkin Manor Greystanes filed an Employers Response (form F3) raising a jurisdictional objection on the basis that Ms Hawkins did not serve the minimum employment period. It also objected to Ms Hawkins’ application on the basis that they had complied with the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code in its dismissal of Ms Hawkins.

[2] My chambers sent correspondence to Ms Hawkins on 30 October 2020 requiring her to provide a statement to support her claim that she had served the minimum employment period. She was asked to provide the information by no later than 4:00pm on 6 November 2020. No response was received from Ms Hawkins.

[3] On 11 November 2020, further correspondence was sent to Ms Hawkins directing her to provide a response by 4.00pm on 16 November 2020. She was advised that in the absence of a reply her application may be dismissed.

[4] To date, Ms Hawkins has not responded to any of the Commission’s correspondence.

[5] Section 587 of the Act provides:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.

(2) Despite paragraphs (1)(b) and (c), FWC must not dismiss an application under section 365 or 773 on the ground that the application:

(a) is frivolous or vexatious; or

(b) has no reasonable prospects of success.

(3) FWC may dismiss an application:

(a) on its own initiative; or

(b) on application.

[6] The words, “Without limiting when FWC may dismiss an application” at the commencement of s.587(1) of the Act, establish that the jurisdiction of the Commission to dismiss an application is not limited to the circumstances set out in s.587(1)(a), (b) and (c).

[7] In the circumstances I have decided to dismiss the application for want of prosecution pursuant to s.587(3)(a) of the Act.

[8] An order to that effect will issue with this decision.

VICE PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR724627>