Tasmanian Ports Corporation Pty Ltd T/A Tasports

Case [2025] FWCA 3529


[2025] FWCA 3529

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Tasmanian Ports Corporation Pty Ltd T/A Tasports

(AG2025/3530)

TASMANIAN PORTS CORPORATION TOWAGE (ENGINEERS) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025

Port authorities

COMMISSIONER SLOAN

SYDNEY, 22 OCTOBER 2025

Application for approval of the Tasmanian Ports Corporation Towage (Engineers) Enterprise Agreement 2025

  1. Tasmanian Ports Corporation Pty Ltd has applied for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Tasmanian Ports Corporation Towage (Engineers) Enterprise Agreement 2025 (“Agreement”). The application is made under section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“Act”). 

  1. Having regard to the material in the application and accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of sections 186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to the application have been met.

  1. The Australian Institute of Marine & Power Engineers (“AIMPE”) was a bargaining representative for the Agreement. It supports the approval of the Agreement. It has given notice under section 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by section 201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the AIMPE.

  1. The Agreement is approved. In accordance with section 54 of the Act, the Agreement will operate from 29 October 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2026.


COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE530844  PR792894>

Details
AGLC
Tasmanian Ports Corporation Pty Ltd T/A Tasports [2025] FWCA 3529
Case
[2025] FWCA 3529
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved the Tasmanian Ports Corporation Pty Ltd, trading as Tasports, who applied for approval of the Tasmanian Ports Corporation Towage (Engineers) Enterprise Agreement 2025. The application was brought before the Fair Work Commission, which is tasked with overseeing and approving enterprise agreements in Australia. The dispute centred around whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the necessary statutory requirements, specifically under the Fair Work Act 2009. The applicants sought to establish the terms and conditions of employment for engineers working in the towage industry, which included provisions on wages, working hours, leave entitlements, and other employment conditions.

The legal issues before the Commission involved determining whether the proposed agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act. This included assessing whether the agreement was "independently negotiated", "in writing", and if it provided for the "proper operation of the enterprise". Furthermore, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement met the "better off overall test" which requires that the agreement must not be worse for the employees than the relevant award or existing enterprise agreement. The Commission also had to ensure that the agreement complied with the "good faith" requirements, including the negotiation process and whether any undue influence or coercion occurred.

The Fair Work Commission found that the Tasmanian Ports Corporation Towage (Engineers) Enterprise Agreement 2025 was independently negotiated and met the requirements of being in writing. The Commission also determined that the agreement provided for the proper operation of the enterprise and met the better off overall test. After careful consideration, the Commission concluded that the agreement was fair and reasonable, and thus approved the application for the agreement. The Commission's approval ensures that the terms and conditions set out in the agreement are legally binding on both the Tasmanian Ports Corporation and the engineers employed under the agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.