TARELLI & LANGLEY AND ANOR
Case
•
[2018] FamCA 522
•27 June 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
TARELLI & LANGLEY AND ANOR [2018] FamCA 522
[2018] FamCA 522
27 June 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned parenting orders and property settlement between the parties, Tarelli and Langley, who had been in a de facto relationship. The dispute involved the welfare and living arrangements of their child, D, born in 2013, and the division of their property. The decision was made by Cleary J in the Federal Circuit Court.
The court was required to determine the appropriate parenting arrangements for the child, including the allocation of parental responsibility, residence, and time with each parent, considering the involvement of the Minister. Additionally, the court had to address the property settlement arising from the de facto relationship, including the division of assets and any financial contributions or liabilities between the parties.
Cleary J discharged all prior parenting orders and made new orders concerning parental responsibility, which was to be shared between the father and the Minister for a period, with the father gradually assuming more responsibility. The child was ordered to live with the father, with supervised time arrangements for the mother. The court also made orders regarding the release of documents and communication between the parties concerning the child's welfare. In relation to property, the court declared the existence of a de facto relationship between May 2012 and March 2014, with the child being the sole issue of that relationship. The court ordered the mother to pay a sum to the father, with a default provision involving the sale of a property, and also ordered the transfer of the father's interest in that property to the mother. All other outstanding applications were dismissed.
The court was required to determine the appropriate parenting arrangements for the child, including the allocation of parental responsibility, residence, and time with each parent, considering the involvement of the Minister. Additionally, the court had to address the property settlement arising from the de facto relationship, including the division of assets and any financial contributions or liabilities between the parties.
Cleary J discharged all prior parenting orders and made new orders concerning parental responsibility, which was to be shared between the father and the Minister for a period, with the father gradually assuming more responsibility. The child was ordered to live with the father, with supervised time arrangements for the mother. The court also made orders regarding the release of documents and communication between the parties concerning the child's welfare. In relation to property, the court declared the existence of a de facto relationship between May 2012 and March 2014, with the child being the sole issue of that relationship. The court ordered the mother to pay a sum to the father, with a default provision involving the sale of a property, and also ordered the transfer of the father's interest in that property to the mother. All other outstanding applications were dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Equity & Trusts
Legal Concepts
-
Remedies
-
Constructive Trust
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Langley & Tarelli (No 5) [2023] FedCFamC1A 208
Cases Citing This Decision
3
Langley & Tarelli (No. 4)
[2021] FamCAFC 107
Langley & Tarelli and Anor (No. 2)
[2020] FamCAFC 126
Langley & Tarelli (No 5)
[2023] FedCFamC1A 208
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
1
Bevan & Bevan
[2013] FamCAFC 116
Singer v Berghouse
[1994] HCA 40