FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| TARELLI & LANGLEY AND ANOR | [2018] FamCA 522 |
| FAMILY LAW – CHILD ABUSE – Welfare of child – Where the Single Expert identified serious risks to the development of the child due to the mother’s personality and mental health difficulties – Where the mother is capable of meeting the child’s basic, intellectual and developmental needs but there is instability in her capacity to meet the child’s emotional needs – Where the father has personality dysfunction but is open to learning and wanting the child to have the best of his mother – Where the Single Expert attributed the child’s behaviour to an emotionally and behaviourally dysregulated environment during his infancy – Concluded there is a need to protect the child from physical or psychological harm. FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – Parental Responsibility – Where FACS intervened – Where the mother became increasingly unwilling to cooperate with FACS making that relationship unworkable for the benefit of the child – Ordered the father and the Minister shall share parental responsibility for the child for 12 months, then for a further 12 months the Minister and the father shall share parental responsibility only for time and communication between the mother and child and thereafter the father shall have sole parental responsibility. FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – With whom a child lives – Where approximately 6 weeks prior to final hearing FACS removed the child from the mother’s care placing him in the care of the father – Where the child is happy and settled in the care of the father and his partner – Where the mother chose not to read the report of the Single expert thus depriving herself of a pathway to the child remaining in her care – Concluded the mother lost the ability to put the needs of the child before her own – Ordered the child shall live with the father. FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – With whom a child spends time – Where the Single Expert states that unsupervised time between the mother and the child would be harmful – Ordered the child shall spend time with the mother for a period of 12 months as agreed between the Minister’s delegated officers and the father in consultation with the mother and thereafter on no less than one occasion per month for up to four hours supervised by a supervision service. FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – Family Violence – Where if the mother had been sexually assaulted by the father as alleged the Court cannot accept she would have travelled overseas with him, stayed in his family home overseas or considered reconciliation – Concluded the evidence does not support the mother’s allegations against the father of alleged criminal conduct and sexual assaults on her amounting to rape. FAMILY LAW – PROPERTY SETTLEMENT – Just and equitable – Where the mother was in a vastly superior financial position to the father and made the overwhelming financial contribution to matrimonial assets – Where the principle asset… |
Continue reading TARELLI & LANGLEY AND ANOR
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- TARELLI & LANGLEY AND ANOR [2018] FamCA 522
- Case
- [2018] FamCA 522
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine the appropriate parenting arrangements for the child, including the allocation of parental responsibility, residence, and time with each parent, considering the involvement of the Minister. Additionally, the court had to address the property settlement arising from the de facto relationship, including the division of assets and any financial contributions or liabilities between the parties.
Cleary J discharged all prior parenting orders and made new orders concerning parental responsibility, which was to be shared between the father and the Minister for a period, with the father gradually assuming more responsibility. The child was ordered to live with the father, with supervised time arrangements for the mother. The court also made orders regarding the release of documents and communication between the parties concerning the child's welfare. In relation to property, the court declared the existence of a de facto relationship between May 2012 and March 2014, with the child being the sole issue of that relationship. The court ordered the mother to pay a sum to the father, with a default provision involving the sale of a property, and also ordered the transfer of the father's interest in that property to the mother. All other outstanding applications were dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
That all prior parenting orders made in the Federal Circuit Court and in this Court in relation to D born … 2013 (“the child”) are discharged.
Parental Responsibility
2.
The father and the Minister shall share parental responsibility for the child for a period of 12 months from the date of these orders.
3.
Thereafter, the father shall have parental responsibility for the child in respect to all matters other than time and communication between the child and the mother, for which specific issue parental responsibility shall be shared between the Minister and the father for a further period of 12 months.
4.
Thereafter parental responsibility for arrangements for time and communication between the child and the mother is allocated to the father.
5.
Until the expiry of Order 2 the Minister shall advise the mother in writing (which includes electronic communication) of decisions taken in relation to long term issues involving the welfare of the child including the school in which he is enrolled, specialist medical treatment and religious instruction.
6.
After the expiry of Order 2 the father shall advise the mother in writing (which includes electronic communication) of decisions taken by him in relation to long term issues involving the welfare of the child including the school in which he is enrolled, specialist medical treatment and religious instruction.
Residence
7.
The child shall live with the father.
Time
8.
The child shall spend time with the mother as follows:
(a) For a period of twelve (12) months supervised time with the child as agreed between the Minister’s delegated officers (“the delegates”) and the father in consultation by the delegates with the mother.
(b) Thereafter, supervised by a supervision service:
i. On not less than one occasion per calendar month and failing agreement otherwise the first Saturday of each calendar month, for a period of up to four hours supervised by a supervision service with all associated costs to be shared equally between the parties.
(c) At such other and additional times as agreed to in writing between the parties.
Release of Documents
9.
In the event that the mother consults or continues to consult a psychologist she has leave to provide to that therapist a copy of the following documents:
(a) Report of Dr H dated 27 June 2016;
(b) These orders and reasons for judgment.
10.
The father has leave to provide to any psychologist whom he consults a copy of:
(a) The report of Dr H dated 27 June 2016;
(b) These orders and reasons for judgment.
11.
The mother shall provide to the father within 7 days of the date of these orders the address (which may be an electronic address) which she nominates for receipt of information pursuant to Order 6 herein.
12.
The parties shall keep each other advised of current residential address, email and telephone number.
Specific Issues
13.
The father shall authorise the school which the child attends to provide to the mother, at her cost if any, copies of the child’s school reports, newsletters and order forms for school photographs.
14.
The mother is restrained from attending the school at which the child is enrolled unless by way of prior written agreement with the Minister’s delegated officer and with the father after he assumes sole parental responsibility for the child.
15.
The appointment of the Independent Children’s Lawyer is discharged.
Property
16.
A Declaration is made that a de facto relationship existed between the parties between May 2012 and March 2014.
17.
There is one child of the de facto relationship namely the child D born … 2013.
18.
That the respondent mother pay to the husband the sum of $257,912 within 60 days of the date of these orders and in default that the property at B Street, Suburb C, being the land in Certificate of Title folio identifier …, be sold and the net proceeds of sale divided 77.3 per cent to the respondent mother and 22.7 per cent to the applicant father.
19.
The de facto husband transfer to the wife all his right, title and interest in the property at Suburb C.
20.
Each party otherwise retain the personal property, superannuation interests and other assets currently in his and her possession.
21.
That the application of the respondent is dismissed.
22.
That the application for departure from the current Child Support Assessment is dismissed.
23.
All other outstanding applications are dismissed.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.