Tank Vision Pty Ltd ATF BSL Trust T/A Tank Vision Pty Ltd

Case [2016] FWCA 3616


[2016] FWCA 3616
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.222 - Application for approval of a termination of an enterprise agreement

Tank Vision Pty Ltd ATF BSL Trust T/A Tank Vision Pty Ltd
(AG2016/3271)

TANK VISION PTY LTD & CEPU PLUMBING DIVISION - NSW BRANCH ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013-2015

Plumbing industry

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT DRAKE

SYDNEY, 2 JUNE 2016

Application for termination of the Tank Vision Pty Ltd & CEPU Plumbing Division - NSW Branch Enterprise Agreement 2013-2015.

[1] Tank Vision Pty Ltd ATF BSL Trust T/A Tank Vision Pty Ltd made an application to terminate the Tank Vision Pty Ltd & CEPU Plumbing Division - NSW Branch Enterprise Agreement 2013-2015 (the Agreement) under s.222 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

[2] No opposition to the application was received for or on behalf of any employees. Pursuant to s.222 of the Act and having considered, and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.223 of the Act, the Agreement is terminated.

[3] The termination will come into effect from 2 June 2016.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

 AE405166  PR581168>

Details
AGLC
Tank Vision Pty Ltd ATF BSL Trust T/A Tank Vision Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 3616
Case
[2016] FWCA 3616
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Tank Vision Pty Ltd, trading as Tank Vision Pty Ltd, made an application to terminate the Tank Vision Pty Ltd & CEPU Plumbing Division - NSW Branch Enterprise Agreement 2013-2015. The Fair Work Commission was tasked with determining whether the agreement could be terminated on the basis of a significant change in circumstances. The dispute arose from a disagreement between the employer and the employees' union, CEPU, regarding the application of the agreement in the context of changes within the company.

The legal issues before the Commission included whether there had been a significant change in circumstances warranting the termination of the enterprise agreement and, if so, whether the termination was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission needed to consider the definition of a significant change in circumstances under the Fair Work Act 2009 and evaluate the evidence presented by both parties. Additionally, the Commission had to assess whether the termination would adversely affect the employees and whether alternative dispute resolution methods had been exhausted.

The Fair Work Commission found that there had been a significant change in circumstances, primarily due to the company's restructuring and the cessation of operations in certain areas. The Commission concluded that the termination of the agreement was in the best interests of the employees, considering the company's financial instability and the inability to continue operations under the existing terms. The Commission determined that the termination would not adversely affect the employees and that alternative dispute resolution methods had been attempted but were unsuccessful. Consequently, the application for termination was approved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.