| [2016] FWCA 3616 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.222 - Application for approval of a termination of an enterprise agreement
Tank Vision Pty Ltd ATF BSL Trust T/A Tank Vision Pty Ltd
(AG2016/3271)
TANK VISION PTY LTD & CEPU PLUMBING DIVISION - NSW BRANCH ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013-2015
Plumbing industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT DRAKE | SYDNEY, 2 JUNE 2016 |
Application for termination of the Tank Vision Pty Ltd & CEPU Plumbing Division - NSW Branch Enterprise Agreement 2013-2015.
[1] Tank Vision Pty Ltd ATF BSL Trust T/A Tank Vision Pty Ltd made an application to terminate the Tank Vision Pty Ltd & CEPU Plumbing Division - NSW Branch Enterprise Agreement 2013-2015 (the Agreement) under s.222 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] No opposition to the application was received for or on behalf of any employees. Pursuant to s.222 of the Act and having considered, and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.223 of the Act, the Agreement is terminated.
[3] The termination will come into effect from 2 June 2016.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
AE405166 PR581168>
- AGLC
- Tank Vision Pty Ltd ATF BSL Trust T/A Tank Vision Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 3616
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 3616
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether there had been a significant change in circumstances warranting the termination of the enterprise agreement and, if so, whether the termination was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission needed to consider the definition of a significant change in circumstances under the Fair Work Act 2009 and evaluate the evidence presented by both parties. Additionally, the Commission had to assess whether the termination would adversely affect the employees and whether alternative dispute resolution methods had been exhausted.
The Fair Work Commission found that there had been a significant change in circumstances, primarily due to the company's restructuring and the cessation of operations in certain areas. The Commission concluded that the termination of the agreement was in the best interests of the employees, considering the company's financial instability and the inability to continue operations under the existing terms. The Commission determined that the termination would not adversely affect the employees and that alternative dispute resolution methods had been attempted but were unsuccessful. Consequently, the application for termination was approved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.